Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Lepsky, K."
  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Lepsky, K.; Vorhauer, J.: Lingo - ein open source System für die Automatische Indexierung deutschsprachiger Dokumente (2006) 0.01
    0.012073731 = product of:
      0.042258058 = sum of:
        0.029209416 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029209416 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
        0.01304864 = product of:
          0.03914592 = sum of:
            0.03914592 = weight(_text_:22 in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03914592 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Lingo ist ein frei verfügbares System (open source) zur automatischen Indexierung der deutschen Sprache. Bei der Entwicklung von lingo standen hohe Konfigurierbarkeit und Flexibilität des Systems für unterschiedliche Einsatzmöglichkeiten im Vordergrund. Der Beitrag zeigt den Nutzen einer linguistisch basierten automatischen Indexierung für das Information Retrieval auf. Die für eine Retrievalverbesserung zur Verfügung stehende linguistische Funktionalität von lingo wird vorgestellt und an Beispielen erläutert: Grundformerkennung, Kompositumerkennung bzw. Kompositumzerlegung, Wortrelationierung, lexikalische und algorithmische Mehrwortgruppenerkennung, OCR-Fehlerkorrektur. Der offene Systemaufbau von lingo wird beschrieben, mögliche Einsatzszenarien und Anwendungsgrenzen werden benannt.
    Date
    24. 3.2006 12:22:02
  2. Lepsky, K.: RSWK - und was noch? : Stellungnahme zum Bericht 'Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen' der Expertengruppe Online-Kataloge (1995) 0.01
    0.010594126 = product of:
      0.03707944 = sum of:
        0.025558239 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025558239 = score(doc=772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
        0.011521201 = product of:
          0.0345636 = sum of:
            0.0345636 = weight(_text_:29 in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0345636 = score(doc=772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  3. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Semantische Umfeldsuche im Information Retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.005163544 = product of:
      0.036144804 = sum of:
        0.036144804 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036144804 = score(doc=606,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 606, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=606)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  4. Lepsky, K.; Siepmann, J.; Zimmermann, A.: Automatische Indexierung für Online-Kataloge : Ergebnisse eines Retrievaltests (1996) 0.00
    0.003651177 = product of:
      0.025558239 = sum of:
        0.025558239 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025558239 = score(doc=3251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3251)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the effectiveness of automated indexing and presents the results of a study of information retrieval from a segment (40.000 items) of the ULB Düsseldorf database. The segment was selected randomly and all the documents included were indexed automatically. The search topics included 50 subject areas ranging from economic growth to alternative energy sources. While there were 876 relevant documents in the database segment for each of the 50 search topics, the recall ranged from 1 to 244 references, with the average being 17.52 documents per topic. Therefore it seems that, in the immediate future, automatic indexing should be used in combination with intellectual indexing
  5. Lepsky, K.: Perspektive - Symbol, Konvention, Wirklichkeit (1986) 0.00
    0.0028215188 = product of:
      0.01975063 = sum of:
        0.01975063 = product of:
          0.05925189 = sum of:
            0.05925189 = weight(_text_:29 in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05925189 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    29. 3.1996 15:11:13
  6. Lepsky, K.: Automatisches Indexieren (2023) 0.00
    0.0016458859 = product of:
      0.011521201 = sum of:
        0.011521201 = product of:
          0.0345636 = sum of:
            0.0345636 = weight(_text_:29 in 781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0345636 = score(doc=781,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 781, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=781)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    24.11.2022 13:29:16