Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Lewandowski, D."
  1. Lewandowski, D.: "Find what I mean not what I say" : Neuere Ansätze zur Qualifizierung von Suchmaschinen-Ergebnissen (2001) 0.02
    0.0156903 = product of:
      0.047070898 = sum of:
        0.047070898 = product of:
          0.094141796 = sum of:
            0.094141796 = weight(_text_:2001 in 5932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094141796 = score(doc=5932,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.15710425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2877507 = idf(docFreq=1650, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03664025 = queryNorm
                0.59923136 = fieldWeight in 5932, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.2877507 = idf(docFreq=1650, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5932)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    BuB. 53(2001) H.6/7, S.381-386
    Year
    2001
  2. Lewandowski, D.; Mayr, P.: Exploring the academic invisible Web (2006) 0.01
    0.008771144 = product of:
      0.026313432 = sum of:
        0.026313432 = product of:
          0.052626863 = sum of:
            0.052626863 = weight(_text_:2001 in 3752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052626863 = score(doc=3752,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15710425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2877507 = idf(docFreq=1650, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03664025 = queryNorm
                0.33498052 = fieldWeight in 3752, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.2877507 = idf(docFreq=1650, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose: To provide a critical review of Bergman's 2001 study on the Deep Web. In addition, we bring a new concept into the discussion, the Academic Invisible Web (AIW). We define the Academic Invisible Web as consisting of all databases and collections relevant to academia but not searchable by the general-purpose internet search engines. Indexing this part of the Invisible Web is central to scien-tific search engines. We provide an overview of approaches followed thus far. Design/methodology/approach: Discussion of measures and calculations, estima-tion based on informetric laws. Literature review on approaches for uncovering information from the Invisible Web. Findings: Bergman's size estimate of the Invisible Web is highly questionable. We demonstrate some major errors in the conceptual design of the Bergman paper. A new (raw) size estimate is given. Research limitations/implications: The precision of our estimate is limited due to a small sample size and lack of reliable data. Practical implications: We can show that no single library alone will be able to index the Academic Invisible Web. We suggest collaboration to accomplish this task. Originality/value: Provides library managers and those interested in developing academic search engines with data on the size and attributes of the Academic In-visible Web.
    Content
    Bezug zu: Bergman, M.K.: The Deep Web: surfacing hidden value. In: Journal of Electronic Publishing. 7(2001) no.1, S.xxx-xxx. [Vgl. unter: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/07-01/bergman.html].
  3. Lewandowski, D.: Alles nur noch Google? : Entwicklungen im Bereich der WWW-Suchmaschinen (2002) 0.01
    0.006618997 = product of:
      0.019856991 = sum of:
        0.019856991 = product of:
          0.039713982 = sum of:
            0.039713982 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039713982 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12830791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03664025 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2002 18:49:22
  4. Lewandowski, D.: Abfragesprachen und erweiterte Funktionen von WWW-Suchmaschinen (2004) 0.01
    0.006618997 = product of:
      0.019856991 = sum of:
        0.019856991 = product of:
          0.039713982 = sum of:
            0.039713982 = weight(_text_:22 in 2314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039713982 = score(doc=2314,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12830791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03664025 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2314, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2314)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    28.11.2004 13:11:22
  5. Lewandowski, D.: Query understanding (2011) 0.01
    0.006618997 = product of:
      0.019856991 = sum of:
        0.019856991 = product of:
          0.039713982 = sum of:
            0.039713982 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039713982 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12830791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03664025 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    18. 9.2018 18:22:18
  6. Lewandowski, D.; Mayr, P.: Exploring the academic invisible Web (2006) 0.01
    0.0062021352 = product of:
      0.018606406 = sum of:
        0.018606406 = product of:
          0.03721281 = sum of:
            0.03721281 = weight(_text_:2001 in 2580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03721281 = score(doc=2580,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15710425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2877507 = idf(docFreq=1650, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03664025 = queryNorm
                0.236867 = fieldWeight in 2580, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2877507 = idf(docFreq=1650, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2580)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose: To provide a critical review of Bergman's 2001 study on the deep web. In addition, we bring a new concept into the discussion, the academic invisible web (AIW). We define the academic invisible web as consisting of all databases and collections relevant to academia but not searchable by the general-purpose internet search engines. Indexing this part of the invisible web is central to scientific search engines. We provide an overview of approaches followed thus far. Design/methodology/approach: Discussion of measures and calculations, estimation based on informetric laws. Literature review on approaches for uncovering information from the invisible web. Findings: Bergman's size estimate of the invisible web is highly questionable. We demonstrate some major errors in the conceptual design of the Bergman paper. A new (raw) size estimate is given. Research limitations/implications: The precision of our estimate is limited due to a small sample size and lack of reliable data. Practical implications: We can show that no single library alone will be able to index the academic invisible web. We suggest collaboration to accomplish this task. Originality/value: Provides library managers and those interested in developing academic search engines with data on the size and attributes of the academic invisible web.
  7. Lewandowski, D.: ¬Die Macht der Suchmaschinen und ihr Einfluss auf unsere Entscheidungen (2014) 0.00
    0.004964248 = product of:
      0.014892743 = sum of:
        0.014892743 = product of:
          0.029785486 = sum of:
            0.029785486 = weight(_text_:22 in 1491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029785486 = score(doc=1491,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12830791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03664025 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1491, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1491)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 18:54:11
  8. Lewandowski, D.; Spree, U.: Ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines revisited : fair ranking for reasonable quality? (2011) 0.00
    0.0041368734 = product of:
      0.01241062 = sum of:
        0.01241062 = product of:
          0.02482124 = sum of:
            0.02482124 = weight(_text_:22 in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02482124 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12830791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03664025 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30. 9.2012 19:27:22
  9. Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.: What does Google recommend when you want to compare insurance offerings? (2019) 0.00
    0.0041368734 = product of:
      0.01241062 = sum of:
        0.01241062 = product of:
          0.02482124 = sum of:
            0.02482124 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02482124 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12830791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03664025 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Languages

Types

Themes