Leydesdorff, L.: On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data : Salton's Cosine versus the Jaccard index (2008)
0.00
0.0020200694 = product of:
0.020200694 = sum of:
0.020200694 = weight(_text_:web in 1341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020200694 = score(doc=1341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.028611459 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 1341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1341)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- The debate about which similarity measure one should use for the normalization in the case of Author Co-citation Analysis (ACA) is further complicated when one distinguishes between the symmetrical co-citation - or, more generally, co-occurrence - matrix and the underlying asymmetrical citation - occurrence - matrix. In the Web environment, the approach of retrieving original citation data is often not feasible. In that case, one should use the Jaccard index, but preferentially after adding the number of total citations (i.e., occurrences) on the main diagonal. Unlike Salton's cosine and the Pearson correlation, the Jaccard index abstracts from the shape of the distributions and focuses only on the intersection and the sum of the two sets. Since the correlations in the co-occurrence matrix may be spurious, this property of the Jaccard index can be considered as an advantage in this case.
