Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Leydesdorff, L."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003) 0.01 
    0.0061268155 = product of:
  0.012253631 = sum of:
    0.012253631 = product of:
      0.036760893 = sum of:
        0.036760893 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036760893 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6.11.2005 19:02:22
  2. Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009) 0.01 
    0.0061268155 = product of:
  0.012253631 = sum of:
    0.012253631 = product of:
      0.036760893 = sum of:
        0.036760893 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036760893 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:07:20
  3. Leydesdorff, L.: How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? (2009) 0.00 
    0.0030839336 = product of:
  0.006167867 = sum of:
    0.006167867 = product of:
      0.0185036 = sum of:
        0.0185036 = weight(_text_:h in 2929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0185036 = score(doc=2929,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045220956 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2929, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2929)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The launching of Scopus and Google Scholar, and methodological developments in social-network analysis have made many more indicators for evaluating journals available than the traditional impact factor, cited half-life, and immediacy index of the ISI. In this study, these new indicators are compared with one another and with the older ones. Do the various indicators measure new dimensions of the citation networks, or are they highly correlated among themselves? Are they robust and relatively stable over time? Two main dimensions are distinguished - size and impact - which together shape influence. The h-index combines the two dimensions and can also be considered as an indicator of reach (like Indegree). PageRank is mainly an indicator of size, but has important interactions with centrality measures. The Scimago Journal Ranking (SJR) indicator provides an alternative to the journal impact factor, but the computation is less easy.