Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Leydesdorff, L."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Rotolo, D.; Rafols, I.; Hopkins, M.M.; Leydesdorff, L.: Strategic intelligence on emerging technologies : scientometric overlay mapping (2017) 0.04 
    0.041222658 = product of:
  0.082445316 = sum of:
    0.082445316 = product of:
      0.16489063 = sum of:
        0.16489063 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 3322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16489063 = score(doc=3322,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050899457 = queryNorm
            0.6098877 = fieldWeight in 3322, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3322)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper examines the use of scientometric overlay mapping as a tool of "strategic intelligence" to aid the governing of emerging technologies. We develop an integrative synthesis of different overlay mapping techniques and associated perspectives on technological emergence across geographical, social, and cognitive spaces. To do so, we longitudinally analyze (with publication and patent data) three case studies of emerging technologies in the medical domain. These are RNA interference (RNAi), human papillomavirus (HPV) testing technologies for cervical cancer, and thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) genetic testing. Given the flexibility (i.e., adaptability to different sources of data) and granularity (i.e., applicability across multiple levels of data aggregation) of overlay mapping techniques, we argue that these techniques can favor the integration and comparison of results from different contexts and cases, thus potentially functioning as a platform for "distributed" strategic intelligence for analysts and decision makers.
  2. Leydesdorff, L.; Goldstone, R.L.: Interdisciplinarity at the journal and specialty level : the changing knowledge bases of the journal cognitive science (2014) 0.02 
    0.023799911 = product of:
  0.047599822 = sum of:
    0.047599822 = product of:
      0.095199645 = sum of:
        0.095199645 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095199645 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050899457 = queryNorm
            0.3521188 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Using the referencing patterns in articles in Cognitive Science over three decades, we analyze the knowledge base of this literature in terms of its changing disciplinary composition. Three periods are distinguished: (A) construction of the interdisciplinary space in the 1980s, (B) development of an interdisciplinary orientation in the 1990s, and (C) reintegration into "cognitive psychology" in the 2000s. The fluidity and fuzziness of the interdisciplinary delineations in the different visualizations can be reduced and clarified using factor analysis. We also explore newly available routines ("CorText") to analyze this development in terms of "tubes" using an alluvial map and compare the results with an animation (using "Visone"). The historical specificity of this development can be compared with the development of "artificial intelligence" into an integrated specialty during this same period. Interdisciplinarity should be defined differently at the level of journals and of specialties.
  3. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019) 0.01 
    0.01034426 = product of:
  0.02068852 = sum of:
    0.02068852 = product of:
      0.04137704 = sum of:
        0.04137704 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04137704 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17824122 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050899457 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8. 1.2019 18:22:45
  4. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011) 0.01 
    0.008620217 = product of:
  0.017240435 = sum of:
    0.017240435 = product of:
      0.03448087 = sum of:
        0.03448087 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03448087 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17824122 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050899457 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:51:07

Authors