-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.01
0.009276715 = product of:
0.027830144 = sum of:
0.017180119 = product of:
0.051540356 = sum of:
0.051540356 = weight(_text_:basis in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051540356 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480682 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.2948418 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.010650026 = product of:
0.031950075 = sum of:
0.031950075 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031950075 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13763237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The generation of aggregated journal-journal citation maps on the basis of the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index (1994)
0.00
0.004724292 = product of:
0.028345753 = sum of:
0.028345753 = product of:
0.085037254 = sum of:
0.085037254 = weight(_text_:basis in 8281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085037254 = score(doc=8281,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17480682 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.48646417 = fieldWeight in 8281, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8281)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Describes a method for the generation of journal-journal citation maps on the basis of the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index. Discusses sources of potential error from this data. Offers strategies to counteract such errors. Analyzes a number of scientometric periodical mappings in relation to mappings from previous studies which have used tape data and/or data from ISI's Journal Citation Reports. Compares the quality of these mappings with the quality of those for previous years in order to demonstrate the use of such mappings as indicators for dynamic developments in the sciences
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Salah, A.A.A.: Maps on the basis of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index : the journals Leonardo and Art Journal versus "digital humanities" as a topic (2010)
0.00
0.0040493933 = product of:
0.024296358 = sum of:
0.024296358 = product of:
0.072889075 = sum of:
0.072889075 = weight(_text_:basis in 3436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072889075 = score(doc=3436,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17480682 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.4169693 = fieldWeight in 3436, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3436)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The possibilities of using the Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) for journal mapping have not been sufficiently recognized because of the absence of a Journal Citations Report (JCR) for this database. A quasi-JCR for the A&HCI ([2008]) was constructed from the data contained in the Web of Science and is used for the evaluation of two journals as examples: Leonardo and Art Journal. The maps on the basis of the aggregated journal-journal citations within this domain can be compared with maps including references to journals in the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index. Art journals are cited by (social) science journals more than by other art journals, but these journals draw upon one another in terms of their own references. This cultural impact in terms of being cited is not found when documents with a topic such as digital humanities are analyzed. This community of practice functions more as an intellectual organizer than a journal.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Opthof, T.: Citation analysis with medical subject Headings (MeSH) using the Web of Knowledge : a new routine (2013)
0.00
0.0040493933 = product of:
0.024296358 = sum of:
0.024296358 = product of:
0.072889075 = sum of:
0.072889075 = weight(_text_:basis in 943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072889075 = score(doc=943,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17480682 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.4169693 = fieldWeight in 943, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=943)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Citation analysis of documents retrieved from the Medline database (at the Web of Knowledge) has been possible only on a case-by-case basis. A technique is presented here for citation analysis in batch mode using both Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) at the Web of Knowledge and the Science Citation Index at the Web of Science (WoS). This freeware routine is applied to the case of "Brugada Syndrome," a specific disease and field of research (since 1992). The journals containing these publications, for example, are attributed to WoS categories other than "cardiac and cardiovascular systems", perhaps because of the possibility of genetic testing for this syndrome in the clinic. With this routine, all the instruments available for citation analysis can now be used on the basis of MeSH terms. Other options for crossing between Medline, WoS, and Scopus are also reviewed.
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Why words and co-word cannot map the development of the science (1997)
0.00
0.0028633531 = product of:
0.017180119 = sum of:
0.017180119 = product of:
0.051540356 = sum of:
0.051540356 = weight(_text_:basis in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051540356 = score(doc=147,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480682 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.2948418 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Analyses and compares in term of co-occurrences and co-absenses of words in a restricted set of full-text articles from a sub-specialty of biochemistry. By using the distribution of words over the section, a clear distinction among 'theoretical' 'observation', and 'methodological' terminology can be made in individual articles. However, at the level of the set this structure is no longer retrieval: Words change both in terms of frequencies of relations with other words, and in terms of positional meaning from 1 text to another. The fluidity of networks in which nodes and links may chenge positions is ecpected to destabilise representations of developments of the sciences on the basis of co-occurrences and co-absenses of words. Discusses the consequences for the lexicographic approach to generating artificial intelligence from scientific texts
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Patent classifications as indicators of intellectual organization (2008)
0.00
0.0028633531 = product of:
0.017180119 = sum of:
0.017180119 = product of:
0.051540356 = sum of:
0.051540356 = weight(_text_:basis in 2002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051540356 = score(doc=2002,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480682 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.2948418 = fieldWeight in 2002, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2002)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Using the 138,751 patents filed in 2006 under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, co-classification analysis is pursued on the basis of three- and four-digit codes in the International Patent Classification (IPC, 8th ed.). The co-classifications among the patents enable us to analyze and visualize the relations among technologies at different levels of aggregation. The hypothesis that classifications might be considered as the organizers of patents into classes, and therefore that co-classification patterns - more than co-citation patterns - might be useful for mapping, is not corroborated. The classifications hang weakly together, even at the four-digit level; at the country level, more specificity can be made visible. However, countries are not the appropriate units of analysis because patent portfolios are largely similar in many advanced countries in terms of the classes attributed. Instead of classes, one may wish to explore the mapping of title words as a better approach to visualize the intellectual organization of patents.
-
Bensman, S.J.; Leydesdorff, L.: Definition and identification of journals as bibliographic and subject entities : librarianship versus ISI Journal Citation Reports methods and their effect on citation measures (2009)
0.00
0.0028633531 = product of:
0.017180119 = sum of:
0.017180119 = product of:
0.051540356 = sum of:
0.051540356 = weight(_text_:basis in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051540356 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480682 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.2948418 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the ISI Journal Citation Reports (JCR) bibliographic and subject structures through Library of Congress (LC) and American research libraries cataloging and classification methodology. The 2006 Science Citation Index JCR Behavioral Sciences subject category journals are used as an example. From the library perspective, the main fault of the JCR bibliographic structure is that the JCR mistakenly identifies journal title segments as journal bibliographic entities, seriously affecting journal rankings by total cites and the impact factor. In respect to JCR subject structure, the title segment, which constitutes the JCR bibliographic basis, is posited as the best bibliographic entity for the citation measurement of journal subject relationships. Through factor analysis and other methods, the JCR subject categorization of journals is tested against their LC subject headings and classification. The finding is that JCR and library journal subject analyses corroborate, clarify, and correct each other.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Rafols, I.: ¬A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories (2009)
0.00
0.0023861278 = product of:
0.0143167665 = sum of:
0.0143167665 = product of:
0.0429503 = sum of:
0.0429503 = weight(_text_:basis in 2713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0429503 = score(doc=2713,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480682 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.2457015 = fieldWeight in 2713, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2713)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The decomposition of scientific literature into disciplinary and subdisciplinary structures is one of the core goals of scientometrics. How can we achieve a good decomposition? The ISI subject categories classify journals included in the Science Citation Index (SCI). The aggregated journal-journal citation matrix contained in the Journal Citation Reports can be aggregated on the basis of these categories. This leads to an asymmetrical matrix (citing versus cited) that is much more densely populated than the underlying matrix at the journal level. Exploratory factor analysis of the matrix of subject categories suggests a 14-factor solution. This solution could be interpreted as the disciplinary structure of science. The nested maps of science (corresponding to 14 factors, 172 categories, and 6,164 journals) are online at http://www.leydesdorff.net/map06. Presumably, inaccuracies in the attribution of journals to the ISI subject categories average out so that the factor analysis reveals the main structures. The mapping of science could, therefore, be comprehensive and reliable on a large scale albeit imprecise in terms of the attribution of journals to the ISI subject categories.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Moya-Anegón, F.de; Guerrero-Bote, V.P.: Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data : a comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI (2010)
0.00
0.0023861278 = product of:
0.0143167665 = sum of:
0.0143167665 = product of:
0.0429503 = sum of:
0.0429503 = weight(_text_:basis in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0429503 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480682 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.2457015 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Rafols, I.; Chen, C.: Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal-journal citations (2013)
0.00
0.0023861278 = product of:
0.0143167665 = sum of:
0.0143167665 = product of:
0.0429503 = sum of:
0.0429503 = weight(_text_:basis in 1131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0429503 = score(doc=1131,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480682 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.2457015 = fieldWeight in 1131, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1131)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Moya-Anegón, F. de; Guerrero-Bote, V.P.: Journal maps, interactive overlays, and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of Scopus data (1996-2012) (2015)
0.00
0.0023861278 = product of:
0.0143167665 = sum of:
0.0143167665 = product of:
0.0429503 = sum of:
0.0429503 = weight(_text_:basis in 1814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0429503 = score(doc=1814,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480682 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.2457015 = fieldWeight in 1814, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1814)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003)
0.00
0.0017750043 = product of:
0.010650026 = sum of:
0.010650026 = product of:
0.031950075 = sum of:
0.031950075 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031950075 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13763237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 6.11.2005 19:02:22
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009)
0.00
0.0017750043 = product of:
0.010650026 = sum of:
0.010650026 = product of:
0.031950075 = sum of:
0.031950075 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031950075 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13763237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:07:20
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.00
0.0014791703 = product of:
0.008875022 = sum of:
0.008875022 = product of:
0.026625063 = sum of:
0.026625063 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026625063 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13763237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03930299 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
