Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Li, C."
  1. Cheang, B.; Chu, S.K.W.; Li, C.; Lim, A.: ¬A multidimensional approach to evaluating management journals : refining pagerank via the differentiation of citation types and identifying the roles that management journals play (2014) 0.01
    0.011683434 = product of:
      0.046733737 = sum of:
        0.046733737 = product of:
          0.093467474 = sum of:
            0.093467474 = weight(_text_:management in 1551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.093467474 = score(doc=1551,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.59117234 = fieldWeight in 1551, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1551)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the authors introduce two citation-based approaches to facilitate a multidimensional evaluation of 39 selected management journals. The first is a refined application of PageRank via the differentiation of citation types. The second is a form of mathematical manipulation to identify the roles that the selected management journals play. Their findings reveal that Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, and Administrative Science Quarterly are the top three management journals, respectively. They also discovered that these three journals play the role of a knowledge hub in the domain. Finally, when compared with Journal Citation Reports (Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, PA), their results closely match expert opinions.
  2. Toms, E.G.; Freund, L.; Li, C.: WilRE: the Web Interactive information retrieval experimentation system prototype (2004) 0.00
    0.004415923 = product of:
      0.017663691 = sum of:
        0.017663691 = product of:
          0.035327382 = sum of:
            0.035327382 = weight(_text_:management in 2534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035327382 = score(doc=2534,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2534, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2534)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.4, S.655-676
  3. Li, X.; Zhang, A.; Li, C.; Ouyang, J.; Cai, Y.: Exploring coherent topics by topic modeling with term weighting (2018) 0.00
    0.0036799356 = product of:
      0.014719742 = sum of:
        0.014719742 = product of:
          0.029439485 = sum of:
            0.029439485 = weight(_text_:management in 5045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029439485 = score(doc=5045,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5045, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5045)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 54(2018) no.6, S.1345-1358