Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Li, X."
  1. Li, X.: Designing an interactive Web tutorial with cross-browser dynamic HTML (2000) 0.01
    0.008781561 = product of:
      0.017563121 = sum of:
        0.017563121 = product of:
          0.035126243 = sum of:
            0.035126243 = weight(_text_:22 in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035126243 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15131445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04321011 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 1.2006 19:21:22
  2. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.01
    0.0073179672 = product of:
      0.0146359345 = sum of:
        0.0146359345 = product of:
          0.029271869 = sum of:
            0.029271869 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029271869 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15131445 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04321011 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  3. Li, X.; Cox, A.; Ford, N.; Creaser, C.; Fry, J.; Willett, P.: Knowledge construction by users : a content analysis framework and a knowledge construction process model for virtual product user communities (2017) 0.00
    0.0049609425 = product of:
      0.009921885 = sum of:
        0.009921885 = product of:
          0.049609426 = sum of:
            0.049609426 = weight(_text_:authors in 3574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049609426 = score(doc=3574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19698687 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04321011 = queryNorm
                0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3574)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop a content analysis framework and from that derive a process model of knowledge construction in the context of virtual product user communities, organization sponsored online forums where product users collaboratively construct knowledge to solve their technical problems. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on a deductive and qualitative content analysis of discussion threads about solving technical problems selected from a series of virtual product user communities. Data are complemented with thematic analysis of interviews with forum members. Findings The research develops a content analysis framework for knowledge construction. It is based on a combination of existing codes derived from frameworks developed for computer-supported collaborative learning and new categories identified from the data. Analysis using this framework allows the authors to propose a knowledge construction process model showing how these elements are organized around a typical "trial and error" knowledge construction strategy. Practical implications The research makes suggestions about organizations' management of knowledge activities in virtual product user communities, including moderators' roles in facilitation. Originality/value The paper outlines a new framework for analysing knowledge activities where there is a low level of critical thinking and a model of knowledge construction by trial and error. The new framework and model can be applied in other similar contexts.