Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Lorenz, B."
  • × theme_ss:"International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen"
  1. Lorenz, B.: Systematische Aufstellung in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart (2002) 0.04
    0.043131992 = product of:
      0.086263984 = sum of:
        0.086263984 = sum of:
          0.03058962 = weight(_text_:k in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03058962 = score(doc=1786,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18280649 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051209483 = queryNorm
              0.16733333 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
          0.034859832 = weight(_text_:w in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034859832 = score(doc=1786,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19514939 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051209483 = queryNorm
              0.17863151 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
          0.020814534 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020814534 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17932689 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051209483 = queryNorm
              0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    AVJ (W)
    BBTT (FH K)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 17:56:19
    GHBS
    AVJ (W)
    BBTT (FH K)
  2. Lorenz, B.: ¬Die DDC im Umfeld der Entwicklung dezimaler Klassifikationen (2008) 0.03
    0.02671511 = sum of:
      0.01469837 = product of:
        0.05879348 = sum of:
          0.05879348 = weight(_text_:authors in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05879348 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23345451 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051209483 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.012016739 = product of:
        0.036050215 = sum of:
          0.036050215 = weight(_text_:k in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036050215 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18280649 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051209483 = queryNorm
              0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The decimal system is one system of a number of possible systems of ordering - and a very symbolic also. The ordering in ten chapters, themes, numbers, etc. you can find often in history. Indeed Dewey is not the genius-founder of decimal classification (against a number of authors)! For ordering and structuring separate schemes within a classification DDC creates a number of important negative solutions, e.g. in the main classes the 'lost' of physics and of medicine as special schemes: Nearly a catastrophe in the times of STM! And against an enormous tradition like Leibniz 1646 - 1716) et alii! Compare Bliss: The Bliss-Classification gives space for 6 numbers »sciences« in a context of 26 classes. Therefore the result in short: DDC (and UDC of course!) are »flowers« of the past, of the first decades of century 20! As a fact the Decimal Classification within the tradition of Melvil Dewey is not a final work: See the increasing number of newly constructed decimal classifications during the years 80 and 90 of the 20th century! Nevertheless DDC is a very great (problem and) solution in its development, internationality, reception - and edge-stone for many thinkers and librarians throughout the world - and an important example for modern translational work! Magda Heiner-Freiling has given to us a great stone for the edifice of Modern DDC: Requiescat in pace!
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a