Search (25 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Lorenz, B."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Lorenz, B.: Bibliotheksklassifikation als Spiegel der Wissenschaftsentwicklung : Beobachtungen zu einem Spannungsverhältnis (1997) 0.01
    0.006701296 = product of:
      0.040207777 = sum of:
        0.040207777 = weight(_text_:und in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040207777 = score(doc=886,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Fachschrifttum, Bibliothek und Naturwissenschaft im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Hrsg.: C. Meinel
  2. Lorenz, B.: Anmerkung zu: Bernd Maaßen: Inhaltserschließung und Innovationsbereitschaft (Erwiderung) (1985) 0.01
    0.006318042 = product of:
      0.037908252 = sum of:
        0.037908252 = weight(_text_:und in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037908252 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  3. Lorenz, B.: Einige sprachliche Probleme bei der Arbeit an einer Klassifikation und deren Registern (1990) 0.00
    0.004738532 = product of:
      0.02843119 = sum of:
        0.02843119 = weight(_text_:und in 860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02843119 = score(doc=860,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 860, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=860)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  4. Lorenz, B.: ¬The Regensburg Classification : a short survey (1997) 0.00
    0.0025503114 = product of:
      0.015301868 = sum of:
        0.015301868 = weight(_text_:in in 5617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015301868 = score(doc=5617,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 5617, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5617)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The University of Regensburg Library was founded in 1964 as a collection of books on open access shelves. Therefore the Library established a new "home-made" classification scheme. Like LCC, a classmark consists in general of three principal elements: location number, classification number and author marks (formulated by Cutter and Sanborn). But unlike most academic libraries in Germany, Regensburg has developed its classification in line with the classification of a large group of German academic libraries. The 34 individual schedules are primarily kept up-to-date by: - Newsletter (semi-annual), published by the secretary at Regensburg - On-going contact between specialists and the secretary - New editions of the individual schedules appearing periodically Our plans in the field of classification include: - Updating according to developments in the sciences and humanities - Online classification
  5. Lorenz, B.: ¬Die DDC im Umfeld der Entwicklung dezimaler Klassifikationen (2008) 0.00
    0.0022310577 = product of:
      0.0133863455 = sum of:
        0.0133863455 = weight(_text_:in in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0133863455 = score(doc=2152,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The decimal system is one system of a number of possible systems of ordering - and a very symbolic also. The ordering in ten chapters, themes, numbers, etc. you can find often in history. Indeed Dewey is not the genius-founder of decimal classification (against a number of authors)! For ordering and structuring separate schemes within a classification DDC creates a number of important negative solutions, e.g. in the main classes the 'lost' of physics and of medicine as special schemes: Nearly a catastrophe in the times of STM! And against an enormous tradition like Leibniz 1646 - 1716) et alii! Compare Bliss: The Bliss-Classification gives space for 6 numbers »sciences« in a context of 26 classes. Therefore the result in short: DDC (and UDC of course!) are »flowers« of the past, of the first decades of century 20! As a fact the Decimal Classification within the tradition of Melvil Dewey is not a final work: See the increasing number of newly constructed decimal classifications during the years 80 and 90 of the 20th century! Nevertheless DDC is a very great (problem and) solution in its development, internationality, reception - and edge-stone for many thinkers and librarians throughout the world - and an important example for modern translational work! Magda Heiner-Freiling has given to us a great stone for the edifice of Modern DDC: Requiescat in pace!
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a