Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Losee, R.M."
  1. Losee, R.M.: When information retrieval measures agree about the relative quality of document rankings (2000) 0.01
    0.0139334975 = product of:
      0.027866995 = sum of:
        0.027866995 = product of:
          0.05573399 = sum of:
            0.05573399 = weight(_text_:f in 4860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05573399 = score(doc=4860,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 4860, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4860)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The variety of performance measures available for information retrieval systems, search engines, and network filtering agents can be confusing to both practitioners and scholars. Most discussions about these measures address their theoretical foundations and the characteristics of a measure that make it desirable for a particular application. In this work, we consider how measures of performance at a point in a search may be formally compared. Criteria are developed that allow one to determine the percent of time or conditions under which 2 different performance measures suggest that one document ordering is superior to another ordering, or when the 2 measures disagree about the relative value of document orderings. As an example, graphs provide illustrations of the relationships between precision and F
  2. Losee, R.M.: Determining information retrieval and filtering performance without experimentation (1995) 0.01
    0.010755292 = product of:
      0.021510584 = sum of:
        0.021510584 = product of:
          0.04302117 = sum of:
            0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04302117 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10