Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Lundgren, J."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Armstrong, H.; Lundgren, J.: Cataloging aerial photograpbs and other remote-sensing materials (1999) 0.00 
    0.0030970925 = product of:
  0.009291277 = sum of:
    0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 5326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009291277 = score(doc=5326,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5326, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5326)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Remote-sensing images are valuable library resources, which provide highly useful information to a variety of library patrons. They are graphic representations of spatial relationships recorded by a device that was not in physical contact with the geographic entity being studied. Effective access and description in the library catalog is necessary so that these images may be found and used. This article discusses characteristics of remote-sensing images and maps: how to identify them; and how to catalog, classify and provide subject access for them. A variety of remote-sensing items and their catalog records are reproduced and discussed, including application of the new Remote-sensing 007 field.
    Type
    a
  2. Lundgren, J.; Simpson, B.: Looking through users' eyes : what do graduate students need to know about Internet resources via the library catalog? (1999) 0.00 
    0.002682161 = product of:
  0.008046483 = sum of:
    0.008046483 = weight(_text_:a in 6093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008046483 = score(doc=6093,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 6093, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6093)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    A survey completed by graduate students at the University of Florida expressed their views of the usefulness of typical elements of description for Internet resources appropriate to their work or studies. The students indicated most support for inclusion of title, primary author, Internet address and summary. Other elements found very useful were subject, level of information, titles of related works in print, date created, date updated, access limits, additional authors, recommended software, system requirements, size of file, edition, frequency, and if graphics are included. Overall, they showed a desire for full level descriptions of Internet resources
    Type
    a
  3. Lundgren, J.; Simpson, B.: Cataloging needs survey for faculty at the University of Florida (1997) 0.00 
    0.0021899752 = product of:
  0.0065699257 = sum of:
    0.0065699257 = weight(_text_:a in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065699257 = score(doc=508,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey of lecturers and students, at Florida University at Gainesville, to determine the degree to which the information provided in catalogue records serve the needs of library users and the usefulness of including and displaying typical elements of catalogue records. Results indicate the highest level of agreement with usefulness of: title; primary author; date; subjects; other authors; and series. There were moderately high levels of agreement for: summary notes; contents notes; standard numbers; publisher; pagination; and related titles; and lower levels of agreement for reference notes; place of publication; index notes; illustrations; and size
    Type
    a

Authors

Themes