Heckner, M.; Mühlbacher, S.; Wolff, C.: Tagging tagging : a classification model for user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems (2007)
0.02
0.015355966 = product of:
0.030711932 = sum of:
0.007841164 = weight(_text_:information in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007841164 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.057573788 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
0.022870768 = product of:
0.045741536 = sum of:
0.045741536 = weight(_text_:organization in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045741536 = score(doc=533,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.057573788 = queryNorm
0.22283478 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Therefore our main research questions are as follows: - Is it possible to discover regular patterns in tag usage and to establish a stable category model? - Does a specific tagging language comparable to internet slang or chatspeak evolve? - How do social tags differ from traditional (author / expert) keywords? - To what degree are social tags taken from or findable in the full text of the tagged resource? - Do tags in a research literature context go beyond simple content description (e.g. tags indicating time or task-related information, cf. Kipp et al. 2006)?
- Content
- Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
