Marchese, C.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Boundary objects: CWA, an HR Firm, and emergent vocabulary (2013)
0.05
0.046253376 = product of:
0.13876012 = sum of:
0.13876012 = product of:
0.27752024 = sum of:
0.27752024 = weight(_text_:firm in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27752024 = score(doc=1066,freq=4.0), product of:
0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
0.04538139 = queryNorm
0.8178384 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Knowledge organization structures are dependent upon domain-analytical processes for determining ontological imperatives. Boundary objects-terms used in multiple domains but understood differently in each-are ontological clash points. Cognitive Work Analysis is an effective qualitative methodology for domain analysis of a group of people who work together. CWA was used recently to understand the ontology of a human resources firm. Boundary objects from the taxonomy that emerged from narrative analysis are presented here for individual analysis.
