Search (23 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Martínez-Ávila, D."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Martínez-Ávila, D.: Classification & authority control : expanding resource discovery (2016) 0.00
    0.0014156717 = product of:
      0.007078358 = sum of:
        0.007078358 = weight(_text_:a in 2827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007078358 = score(doc=2827,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2827, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2827)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Bericht von dem "Fifth International UDC Seminar, entitled "Classification & Authority Control: Expanding Resource Discovery," was held in The National Library of Portugal in Lisbon on 29-30 October 2015". Darin auch: "Ulf Schöneberg and Wolfram Sperber, Leibniz-Insitut für Informationinfrastruktur, zbMATH (Germany) presented a paper entitled "Machine-Learning Methods for Classification and Content Authority Control in mathematics." This paper focused on the domain of mathematics, stating that "until now publications are the most important resource of mathematical knowledge and they are also the basis for knowledge management in mathematics." Following the introduction, the paper covers a brief historical remark of mathematics and challenges for content analysis in mathematics. Then, the authors proceeded to describe the automatic tools and practices on authority control and classification at the bibliographic database of mathematical literature zbMATH, including the development of machinebased concepts and tools to create controlled vocabularies and to improve the Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC) scheme."
    Type
    a
  2. Martínez-Ávila, D.; San Segundo, R.; Olson, H.A.: ¬The use of BISAC in libraries as new cases of Reader-Interest Classifications (2014) 0.00
    0.0013485396 = product of:
      0.0067426977 = sum of:
        0.0067426977 = weight(_text_:a in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067426977 = score(doc=1973,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In the recent years, several libraries in the United States have been experimenting with Book Industry Standards and Communications (BISAC), the classification system of the book industry, as an alternative to the Dewey Decimal Classification. Although rarely discussed, these cases of implementation of BISAC arguably resemble other past cases of replacement of traditional classifications that received the name of reader-interest classifications. In this article, a comparison of the BISAC cases to the previous cases of reader-interest classifications is taken in order to determine if the current application of BISAC to libraries is susceptible to the same problems, dangers, and ends as occurred in the past.
    Type
    a
  3. Moreira, W.; Martínez-Ávila, D.: Concept relationships in knowledge organization systems : elements for analysis and common research among fields (2018) 0.00
    9.5356145E-4 = product of:
      0.004767807 = sum of:
        0.004767807 = weight(_text_:a in 5166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004767807 = score(doc=5166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5166)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a