Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Martínez-Ávila, D."
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Machado, L.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Barcellos Almeida, M.; Borges, M.M.: Towards a moderate realistic foundation for ontological knowledge organization systems : the question of the naturalness of classifications (2023) 0.01 
    0.009137052 = product of:
  0.018274104 = sum of:
    0.018274104 = product of:
      0.07309642 = sum of:
        0.07309642 = weight(_text_:authors in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07309642 = score(doc=894,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053056188 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Several authors emphasize the need for a change in classification theory due to the influence of a dogmatic and monistic ontology supported by an outdated essentialism. These claims tend to focus on the fallibility of knowledge, the need for a pluralistic view, and the theoretical burden of observations. Regardless of the legitimacy of these concerns, there is the risk, when not moderate, to fall into the opposite relativistic extreme. Based on a narrative review of the literature, we aim to reflectively discuss the theoretical foundations that can serve as a basis for a realist position supporting pluralistic ontological classifications. The goal is to show that, against rather conventional solutions, objective scientific-based approaches to natural classifications are presented to be viable, allowing a proper distinction between ontological and taxonomic questions. Supported by critical scientific realism, we consider that such an approach is suitable for the development of ontological Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS). We believe that ontological perspectivism can provide the necessary adaptation to the different granularities of reality.
  2. Sales, R. de; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.: James Duff Brown : a librarian committed to the public library and the subject classification (2021) 0.00 
    0.0010393964 = product of:
  0.0020787928 = sum of:
    0.0020787928 = product of:
      0.0041575856 = sum of:
        0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041575856 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053056188 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 48(2021) no.5, S.375-396
  3. San Segundo, R.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Frías Montoya, J.A.: Ethical issues in control by algorithms : the user is the content (2023) 0.00 
    0.0010393964 = product of:
  0.0020787928 = sum of:
    0.0020787928 = product of:
      0.0041575856 = sum of:
        0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 1132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041575856 = score(doc=1132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053056188 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 50(2023) no.5, S.352 - 358
  4. Krishnamurthy, M.; Satija, M.P.; Martínez-Ávila, D.: Classification of classifications : species of library classifications (2024) 0.00 
    0.0010393964 = product of:
  0.0020787928 = sum of:
    0.0020787928 = product of:
      0.0041575856 = sum of:
        0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041575856 = score(doc=1158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053056188 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Acknowledging the importance of classification not only for library and information science but also for the study and mapping of the world phenomena, in this paper we revisit and systematize the main types of classifications and focus on the species of classification mainly drawing on the work of S. R. Ranganathan. We trace the evolution of library classification systems by their structures and modes of design of various shades of classification systems and make a comparative study of enumerative and faceted species of library classifications. The value of this paper is to have a picture of the whole spectrum of existing classifications, which may serve for the study of future developments and constructions of new systems. This paper updates previous works by Comaromi and Ranganathan and is also theoretically inspired by them.

Authors

Types

Themes