Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.010449684 = product of:
  0.02612421 = sum of:
    0.010854012 = weight(_text_:information in 3045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010854012 = score(doc=3045,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045082662 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3045, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3045)
    0.015270196 = product of:
      0.030540392 = sum of:
        0.030540392 = weight(_text_:22 in 3045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030540392 = score(doc=3045,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045082662 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3045, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3045)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Two dominant theoretical models for privacy-individual privacy preferences and context-dependent definitions of privacy-are often studied separately in information systems research. This paper unites these theories by examining how individual privacy preferences impact context-dependent privacy expectations. The paper theorizes that experience provides a bridge between individuals' general privacy attitudes and nuanced contextual factors. This leads to the hypothesis that, when making judgments about privacy expectations, individuals with less experience in a context rely more on individual preferences such as their generalized privacy beliefs, whereas individuals with more experience in a context are influenced by contextual factors and norms. To test this hypothesis, 1,925 American users of mobile applications made judgments about whether varied real-world scenarios involving data collection and use met their privacy expectations. Analysis of the data suggests that experience using mobile applications did moderate the effect of individual preferences and contextual factors on privacy judgments. Experience changed the equation respondents used to assess whether data collection and use scenarios met their privacy expectations. Discovering the bridge between 2 dominant theoretical models enables future privacy research to consider both personal and contextual variables by taking differences in experience into account.

Date

20. 7.2016 18:22:57

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.8, S.1871-1882

0.006380831 = product of:
  0.031904154 = sum of:
    0.031904154 = weight(_text_:information in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031904154 = score(doc=4889,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045082662 = queryNorm
        0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote

Einführender Beitrag zum Schwerpunktthema "Perspectives on design: information technologies and creative practices"

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.9, S.1874-1876

0.0056856796 = product of:
  0.028428398 = sum of:
    0.028428398 = weight(_text_:information in 8416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028428398 = score(doc=8416,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045082662 = queryNorm
        0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 8416, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8416)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Reviews the 6 principal forces driving electronic information publishing forward: volume of information; need to search for information; information richness; demands of management and distribution of information; low cost technologies (such as CD-ROM) and environmental impact making paper less attractive. Lists the corresponding forces inhibiting this change from print to electronic publishing; habit; incompatible standards; incompatible authoring processes; display incompatibilities; and portability limitations. Concludes with a list of key areas emerging for electronic information on CD-ROM; reference materials; catalogues; bibliographic and demographic data; merketing materials; educational materials; and records (replacing microfilm and microfiche)

0.0015349891 = product of:
  0.0076749455 = sum of:
    0.0076749455 = weight(_text_:information in 748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0076749455 = score(doc=748,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045082662 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 748, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=748)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.5, S.1016-1028

0.0015349891 = product of:
  0.0076749455 = sum of:
    0.0076749455 = weight(_text_:information in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0076749455 = score(doc=946,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045082662 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.5, S.531-545