Momeni, F.; Mayr, P.: Analyzing the research output presented at European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems workshops (2000-2015) (2016)
0.03
0.033932805 = sum of:
0.01580763 = product of:
0.09484578 = sum of:
0.09484578 = weight(_text_:authors in 3106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09484578 = score(doc=3106,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18830468 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.041305628 = queryNorm
0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 3106, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3106)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.018125175 = product of:
0.03625035 = sum of:
0.03625035 = weight(_text_:f in 3106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03625035 = score(doc=3106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16463539 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.041305628 = queryNorm
0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 3106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3106)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this paper we analyze a major part of the research output of the Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) community in the period 2000 to 2015 from a network analytical perspective. We fo- cus on the paper output presented at the European NKOS workshops in the last 15 years. Our open dataset, the "NKOS bibliography", includes 14 workshop agendas (ECDL 2000-2010, TPDL 2011-2015) and 4 special issues on NKOS (2001, 2004, 2006 and 2015) which cover 171 papers with 218 distinct authors in total. A focus of the analysis is the visualization of co-authorship networks in this interdisciplinary eld. We used standard network analytic measures like degree and betweenness centrality to de- scribe the co-authorship distribution in our NKOS dataset. We can see in our dataset that 15% (with degree=0) of authors had no co-authorship with others and 53% of them had a maximum of 3 cooperations with other authors. 32% had at least 4 co-authors for all of their papers. The NKOS co-author network in the "NKOS bibliography" is a typical co- authorship network with one relatively large component, many smaller components and many isolated co-authorships or triples.
