Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.027682498 = product of:
  0.055364996 = sum of:
    0.055364996 = product of:
      0.083047494 = sum of:
        0.061860252 = weight(_text_:k in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061860252 = score(doc=4910,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05177952 = queryNorm
            0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
        0.021187246 = weight(_text_:h in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021187246 = score(doc=4910,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05177952 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

BAHU (FH K)

Footnote

Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.6/7, S. 323-324 (D. Lewandowski)

GHBS

BAHU (FH K)

0.021093234 = product of:
  0.04218647 = sum of:
    0.04218647 = product of:
      0.0632797 = sum of:
        0.021187246 = weight(_text_:h in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021187246 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05177952 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
        0.042092457 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042092457 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18132305 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05177952 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2012 19:25:54

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.145-156

0.014861985 = product of:
  0.02972397 = sum of:
    0.02972397 = product of:
      0.11889588 = sum of:
        0.11889588 = weight(_text_:authors in 3106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11889588 = score(doc=3106,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.2360532 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05177952 = queryNorm
            0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 3106, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3106)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this paper we analyze a major part of the research output of the Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) community in the period 2000 to 2015 from a network analytical perspective. We fo- cus on the paper output presented at the European NKOS workshops in the last 15 years. Our open dataset, the "NKOS bibliography", includes 14 workshop agendas (ECDL 2000-2010, TPDL 2011-2015) and 4 special issues on NKOS (2001, 2004, 2006 and 2015) which cover 171 papers with 218 distinct authors in total. A focus of the analysis is the visualization of co-authorship networks in this interdisciplinary eld. We used standard network analytic measures like degree and betweenness centrality to de- scribe the co-authorship distribution in our NKOS dataset. We can see in our dataset that 15% (with degree=0) of authors had no co-authorship with others and 53% of them had a maximum of 3 cooperations with other authors. 32% had at least 4 co-authors for all of their papers. The NKOS co-author network in the "NKOS bibliography" is a typical co- authorship network with one relatively large component, many smaller components and many isolated co-authorships or triples.

0.0035312078 = product of:
  0.0070624156 = sum of:
    0.0070624156 = product of:
      0.021187246 = sum of:
        0.021187246 = weight(_text_:h in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021187246 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05177952 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.1, S.3-10

0.0035312078 = product of:
  0.0070624156 = sum of:
    0.0070624156 = product of:
      0.021187246 = sum of:
        0.021187246 = weight(_text_:h in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021187246 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12864359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05177952 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

BuB. 62(2010) H.1, S.61-63