Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Mazzocchi, F."
  1. Gnoli, C.; Bosch, M.; Mazzocchi, F.: ¬A new relationship for multidisciplinary knowledge organization systems : dependence (2007) 0.01
    0.008675182 = product of:
      0.017350364 = sum of:
        0.017350364 = product of:
          0.03470073 = sum of:
            0.03470073 = weight(_text_:search in 1095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03470073 = score(doc=1095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051997773 = queryNorm
                0.19200584 = fieldWeight in 1095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1095)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Most existing knowledge organization systems (KOS) are based on disciplines. However, as research is increasingly multidisciplinary, scholars need tools allowing them to explore relations between phenomena throughout the whole spectrum of knowledge. We focus on the dependence relationship, holding between one phenomenon and those at lower integrative levels on which it depends for its existence, like alpinism on mountains, and mountains on rocks. This relationship was first described by D.J. Foskett in the context of CRG's work towards a non-disciplinary scheme. We discuss its possible status and representation in three kinds of KOS: thesauri, classification schemes, and ontologies. In thesaural structures, dependence could be one of the subtypes of associative relationships (RT) which have been wished to enrich their semantic functions. In classification, it could act together with hierarchy as a structuring principle, providing a way of connecting and sorting main classes based on integrative levels. In ontologies, it could be defined as a dependsOn direct slot, expressing the fact that through it a class does not inherit all properties of the other class on which it depends. We argue that providing search interfaces with cross-disciplinary links of this kind can give users more adequate tools to examine the recorded knowledge through creative paths overcoming some limitations of its canonical segmentation into disciplines.
  2. Mazzocchi, F.; Tiberi, M.; De Santis, B.; Plini, P.: Relational semantics in thesauri : an overview and some remarks at theoretical and practical levels (2007) 0.01
    0.008675182 = product of:
      0.017350364 = sum of:
        0.017350364 = product of:
          0.03470073 = sum of:
            0.03470073 = weight(_text_:search in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03470073 = score(doc=1462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051997773 = queryNorm
                0.19200584 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A thesaurus is a controlled vocabulary designed to allow for effective information retrieval. It con- sists of different kinds of semantic relationships, with the aim of guiding users to the choice of the most suitable index and search terms for expressing a certain concept. The relational semantics of a thesaurus deal with methods to connect terms with related meanings and arc intended to enhance information recall capabilities. In this paper, focused on hierarchical relations, different aspects of the relational semantics of thesauri, and among them the possibility of developing richer structures, are analyzed. Thesauri are viewed as semantic tools providing, for operational purposes, the representation of the meaning of the terms. The paper stresses how theories of semantics, holding different perspectives about the nature of meaning and how it is represented, affect the design of the relational semantics of thesauri. The need for tools capable of representing the complexity of knowledge and of the semantics of terms as it occurs in the literature of their respective subject fields is advocated. It is underlined how this would contribute to improving the retrieval of information. To achieve this goal, even though in a preliminary manner, we explore the possibility of setting against the framework of thesaurus design the notions of language games and hermeneutic horizon.