Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"McCulloch, E."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. McCulloch, E.; Shiri, A.; Nicholson, A.D.: Subject searching requirements : the HILT II experience (2004) 0.00
    2.9856144E-4 = product of:
      0.0053741056 = sum of:
        0.0053741056 = weight(_text_:in in 4758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053741056 = score(doc=4758,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 4758, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4758)
      0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
    
    Abstract
    The HILT Phase II project aimed to develop a pilot terminologies server with a view to improving cross-sectoral information retrieval. In order to inform this process, it was first necessary to examine how a representative group of users approached a range of information-related tasks. This paper focuses on exploratory interviews conducted to investigate the proposed ideal and actual strategies of a group of 30 users in relation to eight separate information tasks. In addition, users were asked to give examples of search terms they may employ and to describe how they would formulate search queries in each scenario. The interview process undertaken and the results compiled are outlined, and associated implications for the development of a pilot terminologies server are discussed.
  2. McCulloch, E.; Macgregor, G.: Analysis of equivalence mapping for terminology services (2008) 0.00
    2.585618E-4 = product of:
      0.0046541123 = sum of:
        0.0046541123 = weight(_text_:in in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046541123 = score(doc=550,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
      0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
    
    Abstract
    This paper assesses the range of equivalence or mapping types required to facilitate interoperability in the context of a distributed terminology server. A detailed set of mapping types were examined, with a view to determining their validity for characterizing relationships between mappings from selected terminologies (AAT, LCSH, MeSH, and UNESCO) to the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) scheme. It was hypothesized that the detailed set of 19 match types proposed by Chaplan in 1995 is unnecessary in this context and that they could be reduced to a less detailed conceptually-based set. Results from an extensive mapping exercise support the main hypothesis and a generic suite of match types are proposed, although doubt remains over the current adequacy of the developing Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) Core Mapping Vocabulary Specification (MVS) for inter-terminology mapping.