McIlwaine, I.C.: Subject control : the British viewpoint (1995)
0.00
0.0042405236 = product of:
0.029683663 = sum of:
0.029683663 = product of:
0.07420915 = sum of:
0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029295133 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.044914022 = weight(_text_:system in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044914022 = score(doc=1632,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Enthält das Ergebnis einer Befragung. 0 hielten das System für sehr gut; 13 für gut; 11 für halbwegs gut; 7 für halbwegs gut; 11 für schlecht. 8,9% der Befragten würden das System übernehmen, 47,5% nicht, 43,6% vielleicht
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
