McIlwaine, I.C.: Subject control : the British viewpoint (1995)
0.00
0.004236386 = product of:
0.025418315 = sum of:
0.012709158 = weight(_text_:der in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012709158 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06437006 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.028816823 = queryNorm
0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.012709158 = weight(_text_:der in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012709158 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06437006 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.028816823 = queryNorm
0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
- Footnote
- Enthält das Ergebnis einer Befragung. 0 hielten das System für sehr gut; 13 für gut; 11 für halbwegs gut; 7 für halbwegs gut; 11 für schlecht. 8,9% der Befragten würden das System übernehmen, 47,5% nicht, 43,6% vielleicht