McMillan, G.: Electronic theses and dissertations : merging perspectives (1996)
0.03
0.025877032 = sum of:
0.008442302 = product of:
0.059096113 = sum of:
0.059096113 = weight(_text_:authors in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059096113 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16761157 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766484 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
0.01743473 = product of:
0.03486946 = sum of:
0.03486946 = weight(_text_:22 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03486946 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12874997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766484 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Theses and dissertations as electronic files transferred from the student author to the Graduate School to the Library may well be the first major source of electronic texts that many libraries encounter. To prepare for this potential influx of electronic texts, an ad hoc task force considered work flow and cataloging guidelines. The author suggests expanding current theses cataloging and taking advantage of online information prepared by authors so that the bibliographic records provide OPACS with much more valuable information than does traditional theses cataloging. This should not require a lot of extra work.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.105-125