Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Meadows, J."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Summers, R.; Oppenheim, C.; Meadows, J.; McKnight, C.; Kinnell, M.: Information science in 2010 : a Loughborough University view (1999) 0.01 
    0.008582841 = product of:
  0.034331363 = sum of:
    0.034331363 = weight(_text_:information in 4343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034331363 = score(doc=4343,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 4343, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4343)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: The 50th Anniversary of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Pt.2: Paradigms, models, and models of information science
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.12, S.1153-
  2. Meadows, J.: Purposes and practices of text retrieval (1992) 0.00 
    0.004855188 = product of:
  0.019420752 = sum of:
    0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019420752 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Paper presented at the IIS text retrieval and in-house systems conference, London, 6.-7.11.91. Traditionally, information retrieval has provided a well-defined area of activity approaches via a limited number of routes. It was primarily concerned with retrieving documents identified by sets of keywords (or key phrases). Some flexibility eas added by using Boolean combinations of the index terms. Currently, all these limitations are being trancended. For example, although full text retrieval is basically concerned with key words, it expands the meaning of keywords until they include virtually all the words in the text
    Source
    Journal of information science. 18(1992) no.2, S.83-87
  3. Meadows, J.: Text-Retrieval - dead or alive? : the active management of text (1994) 0.00 
    0.0044597755 = product of:
  0.017839102 = sum of:
    0.017839102 = weight(_text_:information in 8317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017839102 = score(doc=8317,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 8317, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8317)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Retrieval has traditionally been concerned with fairly well-structured information contained in fairly well-defined databases. Current expansion of network access, especially via the Internet, is offering vast quantites of rapidly changing, ill-defined information to large numbers of users who have little expertise in retrieval. An urgent question, therefore, is how retrieval techniques might be best applied to this new situation. At present, a variety of activities are being applied to particular parts of the total information assemblage. It is clear, however, that, if they are to prove of long-term value, they will need to fulfil a number of basic retrieval requirements. A number of potentially conflicting factors, such as the need for increased automation alomg with enhanced user involvement, are examined here in order to try and suggest what direction future retrieval developments may have to take

Authors