-
Meadows, J.: Understanding information (2001)
0.03
0.029981947 = product of:
0.099939816 = sum of:
0.018946756 = weight(_text_:und in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018946756 = score(doc=3067,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
0.031454228 = product of:
0.062908456 = sum of:
0.062908456 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062908456 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.011111342 = weight(_text_:der in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011111342 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
0.018946756 = weight(_text_:und in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018946756 = score(doc=3067,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
0.005827016 = weight(_text_:in in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005827016 = score(doc=3067,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
0.013653717 = product of:
0.027307434 = sum of:
0.027307434 = weight(_text_:22 in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027307434 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
- Abstract
- Die moderne Gesellschaft leidet an Reizüberflutung durch Fernsehen, Internet, Zeitschriften aller Art. Jack Meadows, Professor für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft setzt sich mit Definitionen zu Begriffen wie 'Data', 'Information', 'Communication' oder 'Knowledge' auseinander, die für uns alläglich geworden sind. wie verarbeiten wir den Fluss von wichtigen und unwichtigen Informationen, der täglich auf uns einströmt? Welche 'Daten' sind es für uns Wert, gespeichert zu werden, welche vergessen wir nach kurzer Zeit? Wann wird aus Information Wissen oder gar Weisheit? Das Buch ist eine grundlegende Einführung in das weitläufige Thema Information und Wissensmanagement
- Date
- 15. 6.2002 19:22:01
- Field
- Kommunikationswissenschaften
- Footnote
- Rez. in: BuB 54(2002) H.6, S.424 (J. Herrmann)
-
Meadows, J.: Electronic publishing and the humanities (1995)
0.00
4.70894E-4 = product of:
0.00941788 = sum of:
0.00941788 = weight(_text_:in in 6667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00941788 = score(doc=6667,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 6667, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6667)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- Considers the issues involved in electronic publishing for the humanities: the transition from old methods of publishing to the new; primary texts; secondary texts; ways in which the new media are used; the transition to electronic publishing; electronic books and electronic periodicals; and the impact of these factors on libraries
- Source
- Proceedings of the Second Conference on Scholarship and Technology in the Humanities, Elvetham Hall, Hampshire, UK, 13-16 Apr 94. Papers in honour of Michael Smethurst for his 60th birthday. Ed. by S. Kenna and S. Ross
-
Meadows, J.: ¬The immediacy effect - then and now (2004)
0.00
3.9485664E-4 = product of:
0.007897133 = sum of:
0.007897133 = weight(_text_:in in 4418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007897133 = score(doc=4418,freq=10.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 4418, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4418)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- The 1960s saw the birth of what is now called "scientometrics". One of the queries that arose then related to citations of previous literature. Was recent literature cited proportionately more than older literature? Studies by Price, along with that reprinted here, seemed to indicate that the answer was "yes". This "immediacy effect", as it was labelled, could be measured in quantitative terms, but how to do so required some thought. For example, what was the best form of index for representing immediacy, and what errors were involved in estimating the effect? Discussions of the usage of past literature could have practical implications for libraries. One question, therefore, was what implications, if any, citation studies had for the provision of journals to library users. On the scientometrics side, there were such questions as why an immediacy effect occurred and to what extent it could be discerned in different subject areas. This article surveys attempts to examine questions like these over the period from the 1960s to the present day, updating an article published in Journal of Documentation in 1967. Keywords: Literature, Records management, User studies
-
Meadows, J.: Purposes and practices of text retrieval (1992)
0.00
3.3297235E-4 = product of:
0.006659447 = sum of:
0.006659447 = weight(_text_:in in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006659447 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- Paper presented at the IIS text retrieval and in-house systems conference, London, 6.-7.11.91. Traditionally, information retrieval has provided a well-defined area of activity approaches via a limited number of routes. It was primarily concerned with retrieving documents identified by sets of keywords (or key phrases). Some flexibility eas added by using Boolean combinations of the index terms. Currently, all these limitations are being trancended. For example, although full text retrieval is basically concerned with key words, it expands the meaning of keywords until they include virtually all the words in the text
-
Meadows, J.: Text-Retrieval - dead or alive? : the active management of text (1994)
0.00
3.0585466E-4 = product of:
0.006117093 = sum of:
0.006117093 = weight(_text_:in in 8317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006117093 = score(doc=8317,freq=6.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 8317, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8317)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- Retrieval has traditionally been concerned with fairly well-structured information contained in fairly well-defined databases. Current expansion of network access, especially via the Internet, is offering vast quantites of rapidly changing, ill-defined information to large numbers of users who have little expertise in retrieval. An urgent question, therefore, is how retrieval techniques might be best applied to this new situation. At present, a variety of activities are being applied to particular parts of the total information assemblage. It is clear, however, that, if they are to prove of long-term value, they will need to fulfil a number of basic retrieval requirements. A number of potentially conflicting factors, such as the need for increased automation alomg with enhanced user involvement, are examined here in order to try and suggest what direction future retrieval developments may have to take
-
Summers, R.; Oppenheim, C.; Meadows, J.; McKnight, C.; Kinnell, M.: Information science in 2010 : a Loughborough University view (1999)
0.00
2.9430876E-4 = product of:
0.005886175 = sum of:
0.005886175 = weight(_text_:in in 4343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005886175 = score(doc=4343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 4343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4343)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
-
Sulaiman, M.; Meadows, J.: Icons and OPACs (1995)
0.00
2.35447E-4 = product of:
0.00470894 = sum of:
0.00470894 = weight(_text_:in in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00470894 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- Determines whether iconic interfaces might work with online public access catalogues (OPACs) and assesses problems which students encounter in using icons. Students from the Uk and France were asked to identify IBM, Mac and hand drawn icons and guess their functions. Mac icons were the easiest to identify and hand drawn icons were the least easy to identify. A number of students failed to guess the icon function second time round. Results suggest that an icon based OPAC interface could be polpular, but would require careful design, particularly for a multilingual interface
