Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0051463777 = product of:
  0.010292755 = sum of:
    0.010292755 = product of:
      0.02058551 = sum of:
        0.02058551 = weight(_text_:e in 5701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02058551 = score(doc=5701,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.31119972 = fieldWeight in 5701, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5701)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article summarizes findings from studies that employed electronic mail (e-mail) for conducting indepth interviewing. It discusses the benefits of, and the challenges associated with, using e-mail interviewing in qualitative research. The article concludes that while a mixed mode interviewing strategy should be considered when possible, e-mail interviewing can be in many cases a viable alternative to face-to-face and telephone interviewing. A list of recommendations for carrying out effective e-mail interviews is presented.

Language

e