Melton, J.S.: ¬A use for the techniques of structural linguistics in documentation research (1965)
0.01
0.008292621 = product of:
0.020731552 = sum of:
0.0144164935 = weight(_text_:a in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0144164935 = score(doc=834,freq=14.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Index language (the system of symbols for representing subject content after analysis) is considered as a separate component and a variable in an information retrieval system. It is suggested that for purposes of testing, comparing and evaluating index language, the techniques of structural linguistics may provide a descriptive methodology by which all such languages (hierarchical and faceted classification, analytico-synthetic indexing, traditional subject indexing, indexes and classifications based on automatic text analysis, etc.) could be described in term of a linguistic model, and compared on a common basis
- Type
- a