Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.010828791 = product of:
  0.043315165 = sum of:
    0.043315165 = weight(_text_:library in 2108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043315165 = score(doc=2108,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 2108, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2108)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

It will not be an easy task to automate the Library of Congress Classification schedules because it is a very large system and also because it developed long before automation. The designers were creating a system for shelving books effiently and had not even imagined the constraints imposed by automation. A number of problems and possible solutions are discussed. The MARC format proposed for classification has some serious problems which are identified

0.009475192 = product of:
  0.03790077 = sum of:
    0.03790077 = weight(_text_:library in 7715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03790077 = score(doc=7715,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 7715, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7715)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Library hi tech. 12(1994) no.1, S.55-66