Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Miller, U."
  1. Miller, U.; Teitelbaum, R.: Pre-coordination and post-coordination : past and future (2002) 0.02 
    0.024407204 = product of:
  0.04881441 = sum of:
    0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024031956 = score(doc=1395,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
    0.024782453 = product of:
      0.049564905 = sum of:
        0.049564905 = weight(_text_:organization in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049564905 = score(doc=1395,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27574396 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This article deals with the meaningful processing of information in relation to two systems of Information processing: pre-coordination and post-coordination. The different approaches are discussed, with emphasis an the need for a controlled vocabulary in information retrieval. Assigned indexing, which employs a controlled vocabulary, is described in detail. Types of indexing language can be divided into two broad groups - those using pre-coordinated terms and those depending an post-coordination. They represent two different basic approaches in processing and Information retrieval. The historical development of these two approaches is described, as well as the two tools that apply to these approaches: thesauri and subject headings.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.2, S.87-93
  2. Miller, U.: Thesaurus construction (2000) 0.01 
    0.006007989 = product of:
  0.024031956 = sum of:
    0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024031956 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.68, [=Suppl.31]
  3. Miller, U.: Thesaurus construction : problems and their roots (1997) 0.00 
    0.004855188 = product of:
  0.019420752 = sum of:
    0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 1170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019420752 = score(doc=1170,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1170, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1170)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Analyzes and discusses general problems of thesaurus construction theory and practice, based on research and experience accumulate in librarianship and information science as well as some other sciences and general scientific methods (e.g. linguistics, and systems analysis). Recommends methodological and methodical ways of solving problems existing in thesaurus construction
    Source
    Information processing and management. 33(1997) no.4, S.481-493
  4. Miller, U.: ¬The Sport Database : some comments (1996) 0.00 
    0.0036413912 = product of:
  0.014565565 = sum of:
    0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 4936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014565565 = score(doc=4936,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4936, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4936)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Sport Database is one of the most popular information tools in the field of physical activity and sport, one reason being that its coverage is truly international. The main tool for maintaining the quality of the indexing and searching of the database is the Sport Thesaurus; which exists both in printed form (Sport Thesaurus 1994 ed.) and on CD-ROM (Sport Discus 1975-Jun 1995). These 2 versions of the same thesaurus differ substantially in parts, particularly since the insertion of the large database, SIRLS, into the Sport database. Analyzes the basic deficiencies of the thesaurus, traces their causes and proposes means for its improvement. Suggested improvements include: elaboration of basic conceptual and methodological principles; division of the total conceptual sphere of the thesaurus into parts; distribution of these parts between various sport information centres for editing; joint gathering together of these parts after editing; and permanent coordination between all participants in thesaurus correction

Years

Themes