Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

Lancaster, F.W.; Mills, J.: Testing indexes and index language devices : the ASLIB Cranfield project (1964) 0.02

0.023138765 = product of:
  0.09255506 = sum of:
    0.09255506 = product of:
      0.18511012 = sum of:
        0.18511012 = weight(_text_:project in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18511012 = score(doc=2261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.74617106 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Mills, J.: Library classification (1970) 0.02

0.022447068 = product of:
  0.08978827 = sum of:
    0.08978827 = weight(_text_:library in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08978827 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.58101606 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Mills, J.: Inadequacies of existing general classification schemes (1969) 0.02

0.022221465 = product of:
  0.08888586 = sum of:
    0.08888586 = weight(_text_:library in 1282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08888586 = score(doc=1282,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.57517654 = fieldWeight in 1282, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1282)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Imprint: London : Library Association
Series: Library Association Research Publications; no.1

Cleverdon, C.W.; Mills, J.; Keen, M.: Factors determining the performance of indexing systems : ASLIB Cranfield research project (1966) 0.02

0.02024642 = product of:
  0.08098568 = sum of:
    0.08098568 = product of:
      0.16197136 = sum of:
        0.16197136 = weight(_text_:project in 5363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16197136 = score(doc=5363,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.6528997 = fieldWeight in 5363, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5363)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Mills, J.: Chain indexing and the classified catalogue (1955) 0.02

0.017957656 = product of:
  0.07183062 = sum of:
    0.07183062 = weight(_text_:library in 1979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07183062 = score(doc=1979,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 1979, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1979)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Library Association Record. 57(1955), S.141-148

Mills, J.: ¬A modern outline of library classification (1960) 0.02

0.017957656 = product of:
  0.07183062 = sum of:
    0.07183062 = weight(_text_:library in 3410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07183062 = score(doc=3410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 3410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3410)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004) 0.01
```
0.013468241 = product of:
  0.053872965 = sum of:
    0.053872965 = weight(_text_:library in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053872965 = score(doc=831,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.

Source

Library trends. 52(2004) no.3, S.515-540
Mills, J.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification First Edition (2009) 0.01
```
0.01269798 = product of:
  0.05079192 = sum of:
    0.05079192 = weight(_text_:library in 3808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05079192 = score(doc=3808,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 3808, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3808)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Henry Evelyn Bliss was probably the greatest American contributor to the theory of the classification of library materials. The first edition of the classification scheme he developed is discussed here by a major British thinker in this area, Jack Mills. After some years of use, the scheme was extensively revised, under the Editorship of the same Jack Mills, and the resulting second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification is discussed in the entry by that name.

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
Mills, J.; Lodge, D.: Affect, emotional intelligence and librarian-user interaction (2006) 0.01
```
0.010996773 = product of:
  0.04398709 = sum of:
    0.04398709 = weight(_text_:library in 625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04398709 = score(doc=625,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05877307 = queryNorm
        0.28463858 = fieldWeight in 625, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=625)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore practical ways in which librarians may better assist, understand and manage a library user's experience. Design/methodology/approach - This paper is based on earlier work by Mills where 34 academics were interviewed on their information seeking behaviour. The concepts of affect and emotional intelligence have been introduced so information professionals can obtain a more clear understanding of the information environment. Findings - In order to connect more closely with their user populations' information professionals could consider the following: embrace the key tenets of emotional intelligence as useful assistance strategies in user-librarian interaction; understand that personal interaction is important for many users; understand that such interaction can offer valuable insights into user understandings of the role of the library; understand that there is more to a library than resource access; understand that not all users share the same perceptions as librarians of the information values of such tools as catalogues and databases; appreciate that users see many roles for a library and these are individually constructed based upon past experience and current needs; extending the physical boundaries of the library into user communities is important for role development and accept that the key marketing strategy of commercial retailers to get customers to "buy" and return to buy, is relevant in environments such as libraries. Originality/value - The paper builds upon research on the information seeking behaviour of academics and explores the idea that users select information sources for more than cognitive reasons, i.e. just to find out. The importance of the emotional aspect of user interaction with sources, including information professionals, in their search for information has been neglected. It is necessary to re-examine why and for what reasons users discriminate in their choice of information sources.

Source

Library review. 55(2006) no.9, S.587-597

Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Types

Themes