-
Milojevic, S.: Modes of collaboration in modern science : beyond power laws and preferential attachment (2010)
0.03
0.034591533 = sum of:
0.031651676 = product of:
0.1266067 = sum of:
0.1266067 = weight(_text_:authors in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1266067 = score(doc=3592,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0029398573 = product of:
0.0058797146 = sum of:
0.0058797146 = weight(_text_:s in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058797146 = score(doc=3592,freq=4.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The goal of the study was to determine the underlying processes leading to the observed collaborator distribution in modern scientific fields, with special attention to nonpower-law behavior. Nanoscience is used as a case study of a modern interdisciplinary field and its coauthorship network for 2000-2004 period is constructed from the NanoBank database. We find three collaboration modes that correspond to three distinct ranges in the distribution of collaborators: (1) for authors with fewer than 20 collaborators (the majority) preferential attachment does not hold and they form a log-normal hook instead of a power law; (2) authors with more than 20 collaborators benefit from preferential attachment and form a power law tail; and (3) authors with between 250 and 800 collaborators are more frequent than expected because of the hyperauthorship practices in certain subfields.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.7, S.1410-1423
-
Zhang, G.; Ding, Y.; Milojevic, S.: Citation content analysis (CCA) : a framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content (2013)
0.02
0.021213962 = sum of:
0.018274104 = product of:
0.07309642 = sum of:
0.07309642 = weight(_text_:authors in 975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07309642 = score(doc=975,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 975, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=975)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0029398573 = product of:
0.0058797146 = sum of:
0.0058797146 = weight(_text_:s in 975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058797146 = score(doc=975,freq=4.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 975, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=975)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study proposes a new framework for citation content analysis (CCA), for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content that can be used to better analyze the rich sociocultural context of research behavior. This framework could be considered the next generation of citation analysis. The authors briefly review the history and features of content analysis in traditional social sciences and its previous application in library and information science (LIS). Based on critical discussion of the theoretical necessity of a new method as well as the limits of citation analysis, the nature and purposes of CCA are discussed, and potential procedures to conduct CCA, including principles to identify the reference scope, a two-dimensional (citing and cited) and two-module (syntactic and semantic) codebook, are provided and described. Future work and implications are also suggested.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.7, S.1490-1503
-
Milojevic, S.: Power law distributions in information science : making the case for logarithmic binning (2010)
0.00
0.0017149168 = product of:
0.0034298336 = sum of:
0.0034298336 = product of:
0.006859667 = sum of:
0.006859667 = weight(_text_:s in 4113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006859667 = score(doc=4113,freq=4.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 4113, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.12, S.2417-2425
-
Hu, B.; Dong, X.; Zhang, C.; Bowman, T.D.; Ding, Y.; Milojevic, S.; Ni, C.; Yan, E.; Larivière, V.: ¬A lead-lag analysis of the topic evolution patterns for preprints and publications (2015)
0.00
0.0014699287 = product of:
0.0029398573 = sum of:
0.0029398573 = product of:
0.0058797146 = sum of:
0.0058797146 = weight(_text_:s in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058797146 = score(doc=2337,freq=4.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.12, S.2643-2656
-
Milojevic, S.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: ¬The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science : analysis of article title words (2011)
0.00
0.0012249405 = product of:
0.002449881 = sum of:
0.002449881 = product of:
0.004899762 = sum of:
0.004899762 = weight(_text_:s in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004899762 = score(doc=4608,freq=4.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.10, S.1933-1953
