Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Miyata, Y."
  1. Tokita, T.; Koto, M.; Miyata, Y.; Yokoyama, Y.; Taniguchi, S.; Ueda, S.: Identifying works for Japanese classics toward construction of FRBRized OPACs (2012) 0.00 
    0.0020165213 = product of:
  0.018148692 = sum of:
    0.018148692 = weight(_text_:of in 1925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018148692 = score(doc=1925,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 1925, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1925)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    A research project was conducted in which proper JAPAN/MARC bibliographic records for 158 major Japanese classical works were identified manually, since existing records contain little information about works included in the resources. This paper reports the detailed method used for work identification, including selecting works, obtaining the bibliographic records to be judged, and building the judgment criteria. The results of the work identification process are reported along with average numbers that indicate the characteristics of certain classics. The necessity of manual identification was justified through an evaluation of searches by author and/or title information in a conventional retrieval system.
    Content
    Contribution to a special issue "The FRBR family of conceptual models: toward a linked future"
  2. Kurata, K.; Ishita, E.; Miyata, Y.; Minami, Y.: Print or digital? : reading behavior and preferences in Japan (2017) 0.00 
    0.001577849 = product of:
  0.014200641 = sum of:
    0.014200641 = weight(_text_:of in 3526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014200641 = score(doc=3526,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 3526, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3526)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    In today's digital age, daily reading may be becoming digital reading. To understand this possible shift from reading print media to reading digital media, we investigated reading behavior for 11 media and reading preferences between print and digital in different circumstances. In August 2012, an online survey was used to inquire about the reading behavior and preference of 1,755 participants, ranging in age from 18 to 69 years. The participants contained equal numbers of men and women from five age brackets. Our main finding was that approximately 70% of total reading time was spent on digital media and that preferences favored print media. Cluster analysis of reading time by media was used to categorize respondents into eight clusters, and a second cluster analysis on stated preference (digital or print) yielded six clusters. The correspondence analysis between reading behavior clusters and preference clusters revealed that there is a mismatch between reading behavior and stated preference for either print or digital media.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.4, S.884-894

Authors