Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008)
0.04
0.04151684 = sum of:
0.021057224 = product of:
0.084228896 = sum of:
0.084228896 = weight(_text_:authors in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084228896 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020459617 = product of:
0.040919233 = sum of:
0.040919233 = weight(_text_:j in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040919233 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.
