Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008)
0.01
0.011384359 = product of:
0.028460896 = sum of:
0.0044680727 = weight(_text_:a in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044680727 = score(doc=2294,freq=4.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.023992823 = weight(_text_:j in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023992823 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.
