Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

0.014566084 = product of:
  0.029132169 = sum of:
    0.029132169 = sum of:
      0.0041680736 = weight(_text_:s in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0041680736 = score(doc=2758,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.0832243 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
      0.024964094 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024964094 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The representation of information contents by graphical maps is an extended ongoing research topic. In this paper we introduce the application of UDC codes for the subject maps development. We use the following graphic representation methodologies: 1) Multidimensional scaling (MDS), 2) Cluster analysis, 3) Neural networks (Self Organizing Map - SOM). Finally, we conclude about the application viability of every kind of map. 1. Introduction Advanced techniques for Information Retrieval (IR) currently make up one of the most active areas for research in the field of library and information science. New models representing document content are replacing the classic systems in which the search terms supplied by the user were compared against the indexing terms existing in the inverted files of a database. One of the topics most often studied in the last years is bibliographic browsing, a good complement to querying strategies. Since the 80's, many authors have treated this topic. For example, Ellis establishes that browsing is based an three different types of tasks: identification, familiarization and differentiation (Ellis, 1989). On the other hand, Cove indicates three different browsing types: searching browsing, general purpose browsing and serendipity browsing (Cove, 1988). Marcia Bates presents six different types (Bates, 1989), although the classification of Bawden is the one that really interests us: 1) similarity comparison, 2) structure driven, 3) global vision (Bawden, 1993). The global vision browsing implies the use of graphic representations, which we will call map displays, that allow the user to get a global idea of the nature and structure of the information in the database. In the 90's, several authors worked an this research line, developing different types of maps. One of the most active was Xia Lin what introduced the concept of Graphical Table of Contents (GTOC), comparing the maps to true table of contents based an graphic representations (Lin 1996). Lin applies the algorithm SOM to his own personal bibliography, analyzed in function of the words of the title and abstract fields, and represented in a two-dimensional map (Lin 1997). Later on, Lin applied this type of maps to create websites GTOCs, through a Java application.

Date

12. 9.2004 14:31:22

Pages

S.437-442

0.0012762066 = product of:
  0.0025524131 = sum of:
    0.0025524131 = product of:
      0.0051048263 = sum of:
        0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051048263 = score(doc=2757,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

One of the key problem that non-expert users have to deal with when using an Information Retrieval System is the need to deeply know its query language in order to express their information needs in the form of a valid query allowing them to retrieve relevant information. To solve this problem, Inductive Query by Example techniques can be considered to automatically derive queries from a set of relevant documents provided by a user. In this paper, a new hybrid evolutionary technique is proposed to automatically leam extended Boolean queries and is compared to Kraft et al.'s approach in several queries of the well known Cranfield collection.

Pages

S.429-436

0.001203219 = product of:
  0.002406438 = sum of:
    0.002406438 = product of:
      0.004812876 = sum of:
        0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004812876 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information processing and management. 38(2002) no.1, S.79-89

9.0241426E-4 = product of:
  0.0018048285 = sum of:
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 6935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003609657 = score(doc=6935,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 6935, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6935)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1234-1241

9.0241426E-4 = product of:
  0.0018048285 = sum of:
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003609657 = score(doc=68,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.3, S.481-489

9.0241426E-4 = product of:
  0.0018048285 = sum of:
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 1109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003609657 = score(doc=1109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1109)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.11, S.2310-2316

6.016095E-4 = product of:
  0.001203219 = sum of:
    0.001203219 = product of:
      0.002406438 = sum of:
        0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002406438 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages

S.55-63