Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelne deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelne deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f université%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelnen deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelnen bibliotheken %2f einzelne deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%andern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelne deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
-
Moys, E.M.: Classified v. specific indexing : a re-examination in principle (1997)
0.00
4.2247731E-4 = product of: 0.0063371593 = sum of: 0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 3735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.004365201 = score(doc=3735,freq=4.0), product of: 0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.021569785 = queryNorm 0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 3735, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3735) 0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 3735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0019719584 = score(doc=3735,freq=2.0), product of: 0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of: 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.021569785 = queryNorm 0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3735, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3735) 0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Contrasts the practice of 'classified' indexing (i.e. the arrangement of headings into a limited number of hierarchies) with 'specific' indexing (i.e. direct entry under the term chosen for the heading). Defines and gives examples of both practices and considers their application to law book indexing. There is a long tradition of compiling and publishing classified indexes in law books. Argues, however, that specific indexes are a far more effective finding aid and that readers wishing to make a 'classified' type of approach to a law book can usually do so by consulting the contents list or lists
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1997) no.3, S.135-136,153-155
-
Moys, E.M.: Computer-assisted indexing of looseleaf supplements (1995)
0.00
1.12683345E-4 = product of: 0.0033805002 = sum of: 0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 2966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0033805002 = score(doc=2966,freq=2.0), product of: 0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of: 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.021569785 = queryNorm 0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 2966, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2966) 0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Source
- Indexer. 19(1995) no.4, S.283-286