Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Nahotko, M."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Nahotko, M.: Model of scientific publishing as knowledge organization process (2014) 0.02 
    0.022235535 = product of:
  0.04447107 = sum of:
    0.04447107 = sum of:
      0.007030784 = weight(_text_:a in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007030784 = score(doc=1459,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046056706 = queryNorm
          0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
      0.037440285 = weight(_text_:22 in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037440285 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046056706 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is exploration of possibilities of knowledge organization (KO) approach to scientific publishing. Resulting research model of KO in publishing represents relations between data organization (DO), information organization (IO) and KO in cycle of scientific research process. The role and place of knowledge organization systems (KOS), meant as metadiscourse tools is underlined. It is close to Hjørland's broader sense of KO (Hjørland, 2008, 86), where it can be treated as a social activity aimed at assigning a specific organizational structure to some knowledge resources that facilitates users' access to the knowledge. This activity means, for example, the organization of information in the form of documents - scientific publications, artifacts of knowledge - in the process of codification of knowledge. Furthermore, it also includes the organization of documents in the society, their types, functions and methods of formation.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  2. Nahotko, M.: Genre groups in knowledge organization (2016) 0.00 
    0.0020506454 = product of:
  0.004101291 = sum of:
    0.004101291 = product of:
      0.008202582 = sum of:
        0.008202582 = weight(_text_:a in 5139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008202582 = score(doc=5139,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046056706 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5139, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5139)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The article is an introduction to the development of Andersen's concept of textual tools used in knowledge organization (KO) in light of the theory of genres and activity systems. In particular, the question is based on the concepts of genre connectivity and genre group, in addition to previously established concepts such as genre hierarchy, set, system, and repertoire. Five genre groups used in KO are described. The analysis of groups, systems, and selected genres used in KO is provided, based on the method proposed by Yates and Orlikowski. The aim is to show the genre system as a part of the activity system, and thus as a framework for KO.
    Type
    a