Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ng, K.B."
  1. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.07
    0.066480964 = product of:
      0.13296193 = sum of:
        0.13296193 = sum of:
          0.0620243 = weight(_text_:u in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0620243 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17144279 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052357826 = queryNorm
              0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.07093763 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07093763 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833482 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052357826 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
    Source
    The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5). Ed.: E.M. Voorhees u. D.K. Harman
  2. Belkin, N.J.; Cabezas, A.; Cool, C.; Kim, K.; Ng, K.B.; Park, S.; Pressman, R.; Rieh, S.; Savage, P.; Xie, H.: Rutgers interactive track at TREC-5 (1997) 0.02
    0.015506075 = product of:
      0.03101215 = sum of:
        0.03101215 = product of:
          0.0620243 = sum of:
            0.0620243 = weight(_text_:u in 3112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0620243 = score(doc=3112,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17144279 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052357826 = queryNorm
                0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 3112, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3112)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5). Ed.: E.M. Voorhees u. D.K. Harman
  3. Ng, K.B.; Kantor, P.B.; Strzalkowski, T.; Wacholder, N.; Tang, R.; Bai, B.; Rittman,; Song, P.; Sun, Y.: Automated judgment of document qualities (2006) 0.01
    0.009016784 = product of:
      0.018033568 = sum of:
        0.018033568 = product of:
          0.07213427 = sum of:
            0.07213427 = weight(_text_:authors in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07213427 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2386896 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052357826 = queryNorm
                0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The authors report on a series of experiments to automate the assessment of document qualities such as depth and objectivity. The primary purpose is to develop a quality-sensitive functionality, orthogonal to relevance, to select documents for an interactive question-answering system. The study consisted of two stages. In the classifier construction stage, nine document qualities deemed important by information professionals were identified and classifiers were developed to predict their values. In the confirmative evaluation stage, the performance of the developed methods was checked using a different document collection. The quality prediction methods worked well in the second stage. The results strongly suggest that the best way to predict document qualities automatically is to construct classifiers on a person-by-person basis.
  4. Ng, K.B.: Toward a theoretical framework for understanding the relationship between situated action and planned action models of behavior in information retrieval contexts : contributions from phenomenology (2002) 0.01
    0.0077530374 = product of:
      0.015506075 = sum of:
        0.015506075 = product of:
          0.03101215 = sum of:
            0.03101215 = weight(_text_:u in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03101215 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17144279 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052357826 = queryNorm
                0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval