Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ng, K.B."
  1. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.03
    0.031260397 = product of:
      0.07815099 = sum of:
        0.04679445 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04679445 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
        0.031356532 = product of:
          0.062713064 = sum of:
            0.062713064 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062713064 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
    Source
    The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5). Ed.: E.M. Voorhees u. D.K. Harman
  2. Ng, K.B.; Kantor, P.B.: Two experiments on retrieval with corrupted data and clean queries in the TREC4 adhoc task environment : data fusion and pattern scanning (1996) 0.02
    0.015882565 = product of:
      0.07941282 = sum of:
        0.07941282 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07941282 = score(doc=7571,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 7571, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7571)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman
  3. Belkin, N.J.; Cool, C.; Koenemann, J.; Ng, K.B.; Park, S.: Using relevance feedback and ranking in interactive searching (1996) 0.01
    0.011230669 = product of:
      0.056153342 = sum of:
        0.056153342 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056153342 = score(doc=7588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 7588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7588)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman
  4. Belkin, N.J.; Cabezas, A.; Cool, C.; Kim, K.; Ng, K.B.; Park, S.; Pressman, R.; Rieh, S.; Savage, P.; Xie, H.: Rutgers interactive track at TREC-5 (1997) 0.01
    0.00935889 = product of:
      0.04679445 = sum of:
        0.04679445 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04679445 = score(doc=3112,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3112, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3112)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5). Ed.: E.M. Voorhees u. D.K. Harman
  5. Ng, K.B.: Toward a theoretical framework for understanding the relationship between situated action and planned action models of behavior in information retrieval contexts : contributions from phenomenology (2002) 0.01
    0.008105038 = product of:
      0.040525187 = sum of:
        0.040525187 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040525187 = score(doc=2588,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: "Issues of context in information retrieval (IR)"
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  6. Ng, K.B.: ¬The applicability of universal pragmatics in information retrieval interaction : a pilot study (2002) 0.01
    0.007941282 = product of:
      0.03970641 = sum of:
        0.03970641 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03970641 = score(doc=2578,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the possibility and usefulness of applying Habermas' universal pragmatics to analyze information retrieval interaction. The first part of the article is theoretical argumentation. It examines the current common schemes of studies of human computer interaction (HCI), inspects their appropriateness and limitations, argues for a pragmatic perspective, and elaborates some of Habermas' idea of universal pragmatics. The second part is a case study. It reports an investigation of the initiation and development of verification of validity claims in HCI from the universal pragmatics perspective. It describes some patterns in which a user deals with what may be considered as invalid claims of an IR system outputs. A typical sequence consists of the following pattern: (1) user invokes a simple request; (2) system replies with a questionable answer; leading to (3) user tries to verify the validity claims of truth, truthfulness, and/or rightness of the system output; and (4) when the available interaction channels cannot support the validation, the interaction becomes a non-communicative process which discourages further interaction.