Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Nicholas, D."
  1. Nicholas, D.: Assessing information needs : tools and techniques (1996) 0.07
    0.07179573 = product of:
      0.28718293 = sum of:
        0.28718293 = sum of:
          0.2235809 = weight(_text_:assessment in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2235809 = score(doc=5941,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04694356 = queryNorm
              0.86265934 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
          0.063602045 = weight(_text_:22 in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.063602045 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04694356 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    26. 2.2008 19:22:51
    LCSH
    Needs assessment
    Subject
    Needs assessment
  2. Nicholas, D.; Boydell, L.: BLAISE-LINE : enigma, anomaly or anachronism? (1996) 0.03
    0.031474918 = product of:
      0.12589967 = sum of:
        0.12589967 = weight(_text_:frequency in 5532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12589967 = score(doc=5532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27643865 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04694356 = queryNorm
            0.45543438 = fieldWeight in 5532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5532)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    BLAISE-LINE provides online access to all of the British Library's major catalogues as well as to other major bibliographies. With its MARC records, Dewey numbers and Library of Congress headings (LCSH), BLAISE-LINE remains a tradtional library oriented online service. Presents the results of a survey of 37 libraries using BLAISE-LINE to find out what users thought of it and how it compared to the more modern systems of enduser, fulltext, CD-ROM and the Internet. The principal uses to which respondents put BLAISE-LINE were bibliographical checking, answering subject enquiries, and obtaining interlibrary loans. The survey also covered frequency of use, ease of use, problems in using the system, cost issues, and training and support. Findings show that professional librarians value the efficiency of BLAISE-LINE above the user friedliness of other systems
  3. Nicholas, D.: ¬An assessment of the online searching behaviour of practitioner end users (1996) 0.02
    0.024712313 = product of:
      0.049424626 = sum of:
        0.0047084456 = product of:
          0.018833783 = sum of:
            0.018833783 = weight(_text_:based in 5832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018833783 = score(doc=5832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.13315678 = fieldWeight in 5832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5832)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.04471618 = product of:
          0.08943236 = sum of:
            0.08943236 = weight(_text_:assessment in 5832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08943236 = score(doc=5832,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.34506375 = fieldWeight in 5832, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Based upon a PhD dissertation: An assessment of stereotypical online searching behaviour: practitioner end users (City University, 1995)
  4. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: Viewing and reading behaviour in a virtual environment : the full-text download and what can be read into it (2008) 0.02
    0.022482082 = product of:
      0.08992833 = sum of:
        0.08992833 = weight(_text_:frequency in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08992833 = score(doc=1911,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27643865 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04694356 = queryNorm
            0.32531026 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to focus on usage data in respect to full-text downloads of journal articles, which is considered an important usage (satisfaction) metric by librarians and publishers. The purpose is to evaluate the evidence regarding full-text viewing by pooling together data on the full-text viewing of tens of thousands of users studied as part of a number of investigations of e-journal databases conducted during the Virtual Scholar research programme. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the web logs of a number of electronic journal libraries including OhioLINK and ScienceDirect using Deep Log Analysis, which is a more sophisticated form of transactional log analysis. The frequency, characteristics and diversity of full-text viewing are examined. The article also features an investigation into the time spent online viewing full-text articles in order to get a clearer understanding of the significance of full-text viewing, especially in regard to reading. Findings - The main findings are that there is a great deal of variety amongst scholars in their full-text viewing habits and that a large proportion of views are very cursory in nature, although there is survey evidence to suggest that reading goes on offline. Originality/value - This is the first time that full-text viewing evidence is studied on such a large scale.
  5. Nicholas, D.: Assessing information needs : tools, techniques and concepts for the Internet age (2000) 0.02
    0.01676857 = product of:
      0.06707428 = sum of:
        0.06707428 = product of:
          0.13414855 = sum of:
            0.13414855 = weight(_text_:assessment in 1745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13414855 = score(doc=1745,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.51759565 = fieldWeight in 1745, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1745)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    LCSH
    Needs assessment
    Subject
    Needs assessment
  6. Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D.; Homewood, J.; Polydoratou, P.; Gunter, B.; Russell, C.; Withey, R.: ¬The general public's use of (and attitudes towards) interactive, personal digital health information and advisory services (2004) 0.01
    0.009880973 = product of:
      0.039523892 = sum of:
        0.039523892 = product of:
          0.079047784 = sum of:
            0.079047784 = weight(_text_:assessment in 4433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079047784 = score(doc=4433,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.30499613 = fieldWeight in 4433, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4433)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines statistically the public's use and attitudes towards interactive and personal health services via an online questionnaire survey and enhances these data with an expert assessment of a number of consumer health sites and their services. Over a period of three weeks more than 1,300 people responded to an online questionnaire produced by The British Life and Internet Project. Of the respondents, 81 per cent were British. The likely potential uptake figure for support group participation among Internet health users is about 20 per cent while around 11 to 13 per cent will go online to describe a medical condition. Those in poor heath were approximately ten to 13 times more likely to have participated in an online support group. Those aged over 65 were four times as likely to e-mail their doctor. More positive health outcomes were associated with those respondents that participated in online support groups and the least number of health outcomes were associated with those people that maintained e-mail contact with a doctor or surgery.
  7. Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.: Website usage metrics : a re-assessment of session data (2008) 0.01
    0.007904778 = product of:
      0.031619113 = sum of:
        0.031619113 = product of:
          0.063238226 = sum of:
            0.063238226 = weight(_text_:assessment in 2040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063238226 = score(doc=2040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.2439969 = fieldWeight in 2040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  8. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Fieldhouse, M.: Student digital information-seeking behaviour in context (2009) 0.00
    0.0047701527 = product of:
      0.019080611 = sum of:
        0.019080611 = product of:
          0.038161222 = sum of:
            0.038161222 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038161222 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    23. 2.2009 17:22:41
  9. Nicholas, D.: LISA Plus on CD-ROM : version 4 (1997) 0.00
    0.003975128 = product of:
      0.015900511 = sum of:
        0.015900511 = product of:
          0.031801023 = sum of:
            0.031801023 = weight(_text_:22 in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031801023 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  10. Monopoli, M.; Nicholas, D.: ¬A user evaluation of Subject Based Information Gateways : case study ADAM (2001) 0.00
    0.0029132022 = product of:
      0.011652809 = sum of:
        0.011652809 = product of:
          0.046611235 = sum of:
            0.046611235 = weight(_text_:based in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046611235 = score(doc=696,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.3295462 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Nowadays, end-users have quick and direct access to massive amount of information available on the Net. However, this information is unorganized expecting users to be able to identify and evaluate it in accordance with their information needs. Subject based information Gateways SBIG, organized collections of networked information, provide users with a catalogue of authoritative Internet resources, which can be searched and/ or browsed. This paper provides an evaluation of one such gateway - the Art, Design, Architecture & Media Gateway ADAM. It provides information on who these users are, how often they use the service, what their reasons for use are, which search methods and services they prefer and what are the advantages and disadvantages of an online information service.
  11. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Williams, P.: ¬The characteristics of users and non-users of a kiosk information system (2004) 0.00
    0.002059945 = product of:
      0.00823978 = sum of:
        0.00823978 = product of:
          0.03295912 = sum of:
            0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03295912 = score(doc=675,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Touch-screen kiosks are located in a variety of locations to provide the public with ready access to health information. This paper examines, via a questionnaire, the characteristics of adult users of a surgery-based kiosk. The Esk Medical Centre is in Musselburgh, near Edinburgh. Just under 200 questionnaires were returned and analysed. The research establishes characteristics of users and non-users, how the kiosk fits in with other consumer information sources, what health outcomes result from using the kiosk, and reasons for non-use. The main finding is that the respondents' attitude and previous experience with information technology has an impact on whether the touch-screen kiosk is used.
  12. Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Williams, P.; Huntington, P.; Fieldhouse, M.; Gunter, B.; Withey, R.; Jamali, H.R.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: ¬The Google generation : the information behaviour of the researcher of the future (2008) 0.00
    0.0014713892 = product of:
      0.005885557 = sum of:
        0.005885557 = product of:
          0.023542227 = sum of:
            0.023542227 = weight(_text_:based in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023542227 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.16644597 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article is an edited version of a report commissioned by the British Library and JISC to identify how the specialist researchers of the future (those born after 1993) are likely to access and interact with digital resources in five to ten years' time. The purpose is to investigate the impact of digital transition on the information behaviour of the Google Generation and to guide library and information services to anticipate and react to any new or emerging behaviours in the most effective way. Design/methodology/approach - The study was virtually longitudinal and is based on a number of extensive reviews of related literature, survey data mining and a deep log analysis of a British Library and a JISC web site intended for younger people. Findings - The study shows that much of the impact of ICTs on the young has been overestimated. The study claims that although young people demonstrate an apparent ease and familiarity with computers, they rely heavily on search engines, view rather than read and do not possess the critical and analytical skills to assess the information that they find on the web. Originality/value - The paper reports on a study that overturns the common assumption that the "Google generation" is the most web-literate.
  13. Williams, P.; Nicholas, D.; Gunter, B.: E-learning: what the literature tells us about distance education : an overview (2005) 0.00
    0.0011771114 = product of:
      0.0047084456 = sum of:
        0.0047084456 = product of:
          0.018833783 = sum of:
            0.018833783 = weight(_text_:based in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018833783 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.13315678 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Theme
    Computer Based Training