Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- author's%3a%22Robbio%2c A. de%22 2
- authors%3a%22Robbio%2c A. de%22 2
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.04
0.039725985 = product of: 0.059588976 = sum of: 0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.010618603 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of: 0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.045180224 = queryNorm 0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091) 0.048970375 = product of: 0.09794075 = sum of: 0.09794075 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.09794075 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of: 0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of: 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.045180224 = queryNorm 0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Type
- a
-
Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002)
0.00
0.00395732 = product of: 0.01187196 = sum of: 0.01187196 = weight(_text_:a in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.01187196 = score(doc=3765,freq=10.0), product of: 0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.045180224 = queryNorm 0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of: 3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of: 10.0 = termFreq=10.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765) 0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
- Type
- a