Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- author's%3a%22G%c3%bauer%2c A.%22 2
- author's%3a%22G%c3%baker%2c A.%22 2
- author's%3a%22G%c3%beger%2c A.%22 2
- author's%3a%22G%c3%bayer%2c A.%22 2
- author's%3a%22G%c3%bader%2c A.%22 2
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.05
0.05084835 = product of: 0.1016967 = sum of: 0.1016967 = sum of: 0.009947341 = weight(_text_:a in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.009947341 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of: 0.048801705 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.042324126 = queryNorm 0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091) 0.091749355 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.091749355 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of: 0.14821188 = queryWeight, product of: 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.042324126 = queryNorm 0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Type
- a
-
Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002)
0.00
0.0027803665 = product of: 0.005560733 = sum of: 0.005560733 = product of: 0.011121466 = sum of: 0.011121466 = weight(_text_:a in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.011121466 = score(doc=3765,freq=10.0), product of: 0.048801705 = queryWeight, product of: 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.042324126 = queryNorm 0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of: 3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of: 10.0 = termFreq=10.0 1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
- Type
- a