Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Nicolaisen, J."
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.06 
    0.05829729 = product of:
  0.11659458 = sum of:
    0.061897624 = weight(_text_:science in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061897624 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050463587 = queryNorm
        0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
    0.054696955 = product of:
      0.10939391 = sum of:
        0.10939391 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10939391 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050463587 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
  2. Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002) 0.01 
    0.012835911 = product of:
  0.051343642 = sum of:
    0.051343642 = weight(_text_:research in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051343642 = score(doc=3765,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050463587 = queryNorm
        0.35662293 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.

Themes