Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Nicolaisen, J."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.024964094 = product of:
      0.04992819 = sum of:
        0.04992819 = product of:
          0.09985638 = sum of:
            0.09985638 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09985638 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  2. Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: Intradisciplinary differences in database coverage and the consequences for bibliometric research (2008) 0.00
    0.0014889077 = product of:
      0.0029778155 = sum of:
        0.0029778155 = product of:
          0.005955631 = sum of:
            0.005955631 = weight(_text_:s in 4391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005955631 = score(doc=4391,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 4391, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4391)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic databases (including databases based on open access) are routinely used for bibliometric research. The value of a specific database depends to a large extent on the coverage of the discipline(s) under study. A number of studies have determined the coverage of databases in specific disciplines focusing on interdisciplinary differences; however, little is known about the potential existence of intradisciplinary differences in database coverage. Focusing on intradisciplinary differences, the article documents large database-coverage differences within two disciplines (economics and psychology). The point extends to include both the uneven coverage of specialties and research traditions. The implications for bibliometric research are discussed, and precautions which need to be taken are outlined.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.10, S.1570-1581
  3. Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002) 0.00
    0.001203219 = product of:
      0.002406438 = sum of:
        0.002406438 = product of:
          0.004812876 = sum of:
            0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004812876 = score(doc=3765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.4, S.383-395
  4. Nicolaisen, J.; Hjoerland, B.: Practical potentials of Bradford's law : a critical examination of the received view (2007) 0.00
    9.0241426E-4 = product of:
      0.0018048285 = sum of:
        0.0018048285 = product of:
          0.003609657 = sum of:
            0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003609657 = score(doc=830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 63(2007) no.3, S.359-377
  5. Hjoerland, B.; Nicolaisen, J.: Bradford's law of scattering : ambiguities in the concept of "subject" (2005) 0.00
    7.520119E-4 = product of:
      0.0015040238 = sum of:
        0.0015040238 = product of:
          0.0030080476 = sum of:
            0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0030080476 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.96-106