-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.00980256 = product of:
0.0490128 = sum of:
0.0490128 = product of:
0.0980256 = sum of:
0.0980256 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0980256 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835051 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045219366 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: Praise the bridge that carries you over : testing the flattery citation hypothesis (2011)
0.01
0.0095529035 = product of:
0.047764517 = sum of:
0.047764517 = product of:
0.19105807 = sum of:
0.19105807 = weight(_text_:editors in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19105807 = score(doc=4361,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3035703 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.045219366 = queryNorm
0.6293701 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Flattery citations of editors, potential referees, and so on have been claimed to be a common strategy among academic authors. From a sociology of science perspective as well as from a citation analytical perspective, it is both an interesting claim and a consequential one. The article presents a citation analysis of the editorial board members entering the American Economic Review from 1984 to 2004 using a citation window of 11 years. To test the flattery citation hypothesis further, we have conducted a study applying the difference-in-differences estimator. We analyze the number of times the editors and editorial board members of the American Economic Review were cited in articles published in the journal itself as well as in a pool of documents comprising articles from the Journal of Political Economy and the Quarterly Journal of Economics. The results of the analyses do not support the existence of a flattery citation effect.
-
Hjoerland, B.; Nicolaisen, J.: Bradford's law of scattering : ambiguities in the concept of "subject" (2005)
0.01
0.0053567914 = product of:
0.026783956 = sum of:
0.026783956 = weight(_text_:u in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026783956 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1480683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.045219366 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Context: nature, impact and role. 5th International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, CoLIS 2005 Glasgow, UK, June 2005. Ed. by F. Crestani u. I. Ruthven
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The ripple effect : citation chain reactions of a nobel prize (2013)
0.00
0.0036759598 = product of:
0.018379798 = sum of:
0.018379798 = product of:
0.036759596 = sum of:
0.036759596 = weight(_text_:22 in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036759596 = score(doc=654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835051 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045219366 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 16:21:09
