Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Nielsen, M.L."
  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008) 0.04
    0.036984652 = sum of:
      0.020348566 = product of:
        0.08139426 = sum of:
          0.08139426 = weight(_text_:authors in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08139426 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23085476 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050639216 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.016636088 = product of:
        0.049908265 = sum of:
          0.049908265 = weight(_text_:k in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049908265 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18077075 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050639216 = queryNorm
              0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.
  2. Matthews, B.; Jones, C.; Puzon, B.; Moon, J.; Tudhope, D.; Golub, K.; Nielsen, M.L.: ¬An evaluation of enhancing social tagging with a knowledge organization system (2010) 0.01
    0.00594146 = product of:
      0.01188292 = sum of:
        0.01188292 = product of:
          0.03564876 = sum of:
            0.03564876 = weight(_text_:k in 4171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03564876 = score(doc=4171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18077075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050639216 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4171)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)