-
Nielsen, M.L.: ¬The word association method (2002)
0.04
0.03899721 = product of:
0.07799442 = sum of:
0.07799442 = product of:
0.15598884 = sum of:
0.15598884 = weight(_text_:x in 3811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15598884 = score(doc=3811,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.65316284 = fieldWeight in 3811, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3811)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- x
-
Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction : key issues and selected readings (2004)
0.01
0.013409628 = product of:
0.026819255 = sum of:
0.026819255 = product of:
0.05363851 = sum of:
0.05363851 = weight(_text_:22 in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05363851 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 5.2006 20:06:22
-
Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008)
0.01
0.011363196 = product of:
0.022726392 = sum of:
0.022726392 = product of:
0.09090557 = sum of:
0.09090557 = weight(_text_:authors in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09090557 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25783125 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.