Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Notess, G.R."
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Notess, G.R.: Toward more comprehensive Web searching : single searching versus megasearching (1998) 0.01 
    0.012007969 = product of:
  0.036023907 = sum of:
    0.012365777 = weight(_text_:in in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012365777 = score(doc=3278,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
    0.02365813 = product of:
      0.04731626 = sum of:
        0.04731626 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04731626 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    In spite of their size, the major Web indexes are not comprehensive. Considers approaches carrying out comprehensive searches, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. In the single search tool approach, users search the largest of the databses one by one, using the command language uniqe to each to increase the precision of the esearch. In the megasearch approach, search engines use 1 form that simultaneously seands a single query to a number of search engines and then presents the results. Inference Find, Dogpile and MetaFind are examples of good metasearch engines
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.2, S.73-76
  2. Notess, G.R.: Searching the Web with AltaVista (1996) 0.00 
    0.0017848461 = product of:
  0.010709076 = sum of:
    0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 5668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010709076 = score(doc=5668,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5668, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5668)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    As its name implies, this is an article in narrative format explaining the AltaVista search eingine
  3. Notess, G.R.: Comparing net directories (1997) 0.00 
    0.0014873719 = product of:
  0.008924231 = sum of:
    0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008924231 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Reviews subject oriented directories of Internet resources. Covers: Excite Reviews from Excite, Magellan, Lycos' Top5 per cent, and Yahoo! Compares them to each other and sees how well they describe, rate and cover sites in specific subject areas
  4. Notess, G.R.: New features of the Web indexes (1997) 0.00 
    0.0014873719 = product of:
  0.008924231 = sum of:
    0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 1560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008924231 = score(doc=1560,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1560, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1560)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Reviews recent changes in 3 Internet search engines. Lycos has implemented full Boolean searching and supports proximity search. AltaVista has introduced LiveTopics, a vocabulary tool for refining search results. Excite Channels is reorganizing from its supplemental database into a 1 page starting point
  5. Notess, G.R.: Measuring the size of Internet databases (1997) 0.00 
    0.0011898974 = product of:
  0.0071393843 = sum of:
    0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071393843 = score(doc=1461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Compares WWW search engines to each other in terms of database size and overlap between the largest of them. Compares: AltaVista, Excite, HotBot, Infoseek, Lycos, Magellan, the Open Text index and WebCrawler. HotBot consistently finds more pages than any of the others. Considers how availability of hits, duplication and overlap affects evaluation of database size
  6. Notess, G.R.: Custom search engines : tools and tips (2008) 0.00 
    0.0010411602 = product of:
  0.006246961 = sum of:
    0.006246961 = weight(_text_:in in 2145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006246961 = score(doc=2145,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 2145, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2145)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 28(2008) no.5, S.16-

Years