Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rswk_00%3a%22World wide web %2f elektronische bibliothek %2f information retrieval %2f kongress %2f trondheim %3.2003%3E%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22World wide web %2f elektronische bibliothek %2f information retrieval %2f kongress %2f trondheim %32003%3E%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22World wide web %2f elektronische bibliothek %2f information retrieval %2f kongresse %2f trondheim %3.2003%3E%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22World wide web %2f elektronische bibliothek %2f information retrieval %2f kongress %2f trondheim %3.2008%3E%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22World wide web %2f elektronische bibliothek %2f information retrieval %2f kongresu %2f trondheim %3.2003%3E%22 2
-
Kleeck, D. Van; Nakano, H.; Langford, G.; Shelton, T.; Lundgren, J.; O'Dell, A.J.: Managing bibliographic data quality for electronic resources (2017)
0.00
0.0036609212 = product of: 0.051252894 = sum of: 0.051252894 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 5160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.051252894 = score(doc=5160,freq=2.0), product of: 0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of: 4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218) 0.029633347 = queryNorm 0.36573824 = fieldWeight in 5160, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5160) 0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Form
- Elektronische Dokumente
-
O'Dell, A.J.: Maker metadata : problems and possibilities (2015)
0.00
5.04483E-4 = product of: 0.0070627616 = sum of: 0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0070627616 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of: 0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of: 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.029633347 = queryNorm 0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618) 0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Information about makers is critical to bibliographic research, and special collections cataloging norms provide maker metadata. Still, access to maker metadata is hampered in online library catalogs. This article investigates the betterment of maker metadata in (or alongside) library catalogs using existing content guidelines, encoding schemas, and data models. Discussion finds that libraries have appropriate tools for improving access to maker metadata. This article thus encourages the profession to coordinate access to maker metadata. Cooperative maker description and the merger and/or linking of datasets generated by the research community are suggested areas for future investigation.